Is Multiplication Defined in This Field Sufficient for ℂ to be a Field?

  • Level: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bachelier
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Plane
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
4 replies · 2K views
Bachelier
Messages
375
Reaction score
0
if I define The plane: ##F = ℝ## x ##ℝ = \{ (a, b) | a, b ∈ ℝ \} ##

and define addition and multiplication as:
(a, b) + (c, d) := (a + c, b + d)
(a, b) · (c, d) := (ac, bd)

Then ##F## is a field. right?

would the multiplication as described here make ℂ a field?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Bachelier said:
if I define The plane: ##F = ℝ## x ##ℝ = \{ (a, b) | a, b ∈ ℝ \} ##

and define addition and multiplication as:
(a, b) + (c, d) := (a + c, b + d)
(a, b) · (c, d) := (ac, bd)

Then ##F## is a field. right?

No, you have zero divisors.

would the multiplication as described here make ℂ a field?

How would you do i2 = -1?
 


pwsnafu said:
No, you have zero divisors.

You mean like (0,7).(8,0)
 
Yes, neither (7, 0) nor (0, 8) is the additive identity but neither has a mulitplicative inverse.
 
thanks. Basically ℂ will fail to be an integral domain in the first place under this operation.
 
Last edited: