Is my background too weak to study superconductivity?

kczFI
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I tried to study BCS theory but got stuck, here are my notes:
528e43688655f.jpg

528e434b965f9.jpg


I have a civil engineering degree but now I am doing a master course in physics. I know most of the undergraduate level physics including modern physics (base on Young and Freedman's book), although I cannot say I am very good at them.

Now I am preparing for my master thesis, I want to get a thorough understanding of BCS but the experience is miserable - not only the physics but also the maths are over my head, is my background really too weak for studying this? Is it necessary for me to take some "introductory" course in relevant field? say quantum mechanics or linear algebra?

Also, I will be really appreciated if anyone could give me some advices for the questions on my notes too, thanks a lot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like your background in differential equations needs boosting, for one. Have you studied ODE and PDE?
 
All your remarks in the source are good and reasonable questions, and most are answered in introductory solid state physics books like Ashcroft and Mermin, which I would recommend you for study.
 
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Back
Top