Is my lab missing something in their calculation of drag on a cylinder?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of the drag coefficient for a non-rotating cylinder using pressure coefficients. The user challenges their lab's equation, which states that pressure on the cylinder can be predicted by \((p-p_{0})_{max} \times \cos(\theta)\), arguing instead for the equation \((p-p_{0})_{max} \times (1-4\sin^{2}(\theta))\). The correct derivation involves applying Bernoulli's principle to arrive at the pressure distribution around the cylinder, confirming that the drag coefficient \(C_{p}\) indeed equals \(1 - 4\sin^{2}(\theta)\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bernoulli's equation and its applications in fluid dynamics
  • Familiarity with drag coefficient calculations in fluid mechanics
  • Knowledge of pressure coefficients and their significance in aerodynamic studies
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical derivations involving trigonometric functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Bernoulli's equation and its implications for fluid flow around objects
  • Research the concept of pressure coefficients in fluid dynamics, focusing on their application to cylindrical bodies
  • Explore computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tools for simulating drag on various geometries
  • Learn about the experimental methods for measuring drag coefficients in laboratory settings
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in fluid dynamics, mechanical engineers, and anyone involved in experimental aerodynamics or drag coefficient analysis.

saad87
Messages
83
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm writing a lab report on drag on a non-rotating cylinder. The drag coefficient is calculated using the Pressure co-efficient. The problem I'm facing is that my lab states that the pressure on the cylinder can be predicted by \left(p-p_{0}\right)_{max} \times cos(\theta)

The Attempt at a Solution


The research I've done on the subject leads me to conclude that the pressure on a cylinder can be predicted by \left(p-p_{0}\right)_{max} \times \left(1-4sin^{2}(\theta) instead of the above mentioned equation.

The following is a plot I did in pylab with the experimental plot in blue and the therotical plot in green (using the 2nd equation). The y-axis represents the coeffiecent of pressure while the x-axis is the position from the stagnation point on the cylinder, in degrees.

drag-cylinder.png


My question is, am I missing something? Or is my lab wrong on this? I've been literally reading every material I can get my hands on for the past 3 or 4 hours and I'm still terribly confused.

EDIT: The following is the text from my lab notebook which confuses me.

Drag acts in the plane of motion so the pressure acting in this plane on an element at θ degrees to the cylinder is (p-p0)cosθ. The area it acts upon is small and equal to Rδθ for a unit length of the cylinder. The force on the element in the plane of the drag is the pressure multiplied by the area of the element = (p - p0)Rcosθδθ.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
"Drag acts in the plane of motion so the pressure acting in this plane on an element at θ degrees to the cylinder is (p-p0)cosθ."

The wording might be a bit confusing.

It should read something like: The contribution of pressure to Drag is (p-p0) cosθ at an angle θ. Since force is calculated by the following equation

F = - INTEGRAL (p * n )dS , wheren is the normal vector.

it is easy to see that the contribution to drag (Fx: force in the x-direction) is in fact (p-p0) cosθ. (simply by using Cartesian coordinates)


**sorry, i don't know how to add all the fancy math symbols.

following through your calculations you should get
[text]\left(p-p_{0}\right)_{max} \times \left(1-4sin^{2}(\theta)[/tex]

"The force on the element in the plane of the drag is the pressure multiplied by the area of the element = (p - p0)Rcosθδθ."

basically the equation i wrote above for force, but this is for a differential force (dFx).

hopefully this was of some use.
 
I'm sorry,
this is wrong:

\left(p-p_{0}\right)_{max} \times \left(1-4sin^{2}(\theta)

you should solve for p-p0 through Bernoulli's, but the rest i wrote should be okay.
 
To get 1-4sin^2(x), I did use Bernoulli's. The following page gives the derivation, you'll have to scroll down a bit.

http://www.ecourses.ou.edu/cgi-bin/ebook.cgi?doc=&topic=fl&chap_sec=07.4&page=theory

Since,

p_{0}+\frac{1}{2}\rho U^{2} = p + \frac{1}{2}\rho v^{2}_{\theta}

where U is the velocity of the air flow and v is the velocity of the airflow at \theta. v is given by v = 2U\sin\theta

Rearranging for p-p0

p-p_{0} = \frac{1}{2}\rho\left(U^{2} - v^{2}_{\theta}\right)}

Subtituting into the equation for Cp:

C_{p} = \frac{\frac{1}{2}\rho\left(U^{2} - v^{2}_{\theta}\right)}{\frac{1}{2}\rho U^{2}}

If I substitute v = 2U\sin\theta in the above equation and cancel various terms, I end up with the following:

C_{p} = 1 - 4\sin^{2}\theta

Does this make sense? I have not studied this material into this much depth, I knew Bernoulli but I don't know how we end up with v = 2U\sin\theta, so I just took it on faith from the above mentioned website and did the derivation.

I just want to show a theoretical pressure distribution i.e pressure distribution around a cylinder in a ideal flow, that's why I'm hunting for a function (and ended up with the above mentioned one) for Cp in terms of the position of the cylinder.
 
your equations are correct. It seems to me that if you read the section "Flow Past a Fixed Circular Cylinder" in the link you provided, you will know how v = 2 U sin(theta)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K