Is My Lagrangian Approach to This Inclined Plane Problem Correct?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving a particle on an inclined plane that is being raised at a constant rate. The participants are exploring the application of Lagrangian mechanics to derive the equations of motion for the system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the formulation of the Lagrangian and questioning the inclusion of time-dependent factors related to the changing incline. There are discussions about the correct representation of kinetic and potential energy in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing hints and alternative approaches. Some are questioning the assumptions made in the original formulation of the Lagrangian, while others are suggesting different methods to analyze the problem, such as using conservation of energy.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted lack of formal training among some participants regarding Lagrangian mechanics, which may influence their understanding and approach to the problem. Additionally, the changing nature of the incline and its effects on the particle's motion are central to the discussion.

Rob Hal
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I posted this yesterday, but I figured I'd better post it again since the other thread can't be replied to at this time since its in the archives.

I'm looking for some advice on whether or not I'm doing a problem correctly.

The problem is:
A particle of mass m rests on a smooth plane. (the particle starts at r) The plane is raised to an inclination \theta, at a constant rate \alpha, with \theta = 0 at t=0, causing the particle to move down the plane.

So, I'm taking the x to be the distance the particle travels down the slope.

I come up with the following as the Lagrangian:

L = \frac{1}{2} m\dot{x}^2 - mg(r-x)sin\theta

I'm not sure if this is correct.

I would then get the equations of motion to be mgsin\theta - m\ddot{x}=0 and -mgsin(r-x)cos\theta=0.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't seem to have explicitly factored in that the slope is changing in time. (There is no alpha dependence in your equations.) What this also means is that the velocity of the particle is not as simple as it seems, and is not along the inclined plane in the lab reference frame anyway. For example, the particle on the slope has velocity component perpendicular to the incline, that matches the incline's velocity at that point perpendicular to its surface.

Be careful about which reference frame you are using when you write down the equations.

One way to suspect that you don't quite have the right answer is that the solution you give would be the same for a static incline - do you really think the solution should be the same?
 
I'm also just learning about Lagrangians, and I probably would have made the same mistake without the above hint, but would the Lagrangian instead be:
L= \frac{1}{2}m \dot{r}^2 + \frac{1}{2}mr^{2}\dot{\theta}^{2} -mgrsin\theta
Is that correct?
 
I mean a much more elementary way to look at it is simple conservation of energy to find out what energy contributions there are.

KE: T trans + T rot
PE: V(y)

Ttrans: .5mr^2
T rot: .5Iw^2
V: mg(sin[theta])

where you would figure out I as a particle on a massless string.
 
I haven't had any formal training in solving Lagrange's equations, but here's what I would do:

\frac{d}{dt} \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{r}} -\frac{\partial L}{\partial r}=0 and \frac{d}{dt} \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{\theta}} -\frac{\partial L}{\partial \theta}=0

Which I'd then solve to get:

m \ddot{r}+mgsin\theta=0 and mr^2 \ddot{\theta}+mgrcos\theta=0
Is that the right way to do it?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K