Is my proof of Simon's line theorem complete?

  • Thread starter Thread starter disregardthat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometry Line
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the proof of Simson's line theorem involving triangle ABC inscribed in a circle and an arbitrary point P. The proof details the construction of perpendiculars from P to the triangle's sides and establishes relationships between various angles formed by these constructions. Key points include the identification of cyclic quadrilaterals and the collinearity of points U, Y, and Z. Participants also discuss the correct terminology, noting that it should be "Simson's line" rather than "Simons line." The conversation highlights the use of GeoGebra for geometric visualization and encourages further feedback on the proof's completeness.
disregardthat
Science Advisor
Messages
1,864
Reaction score
34
I have written a proof of the simons line theorem. I would appreciate if someone would tell me if it's complete.

We have \Delta ABC inscrubed in a circle, and P is an arbitrary point that does not coincide with either of the corners of the triangle. (See attached figure).

Now draw perpendiculars from P to [AB], [AC] and [BC] which intersect with the lines in U, \ Y and Z respectively.

Let E be the point of intersection between [PU] and [AY].
Let T be the point of intersection between [AC] and [BP].

Let \angle BZP=\alpha and \angle APU=\beta.

Now as \angle BZP and \angle BUP are supplementary, BZPU is a cyclic quadrilateral \Rightarrow \angle PUZ = \alpha.

Now as \angle PAC subtend over the same arc as \angle PBZ, \ \angle PAC = \alpha \Rightarrow \angle UAR = 90 - (\alpha +\beta) \Rightarrow \angle ARU = \alpha + \beta \Rightarrow \angle PET = \alpha +\beta.

Let \angle UZB = \gamma \Rightarrow \angle UPB = \gamma.

As \angle CYP and \angle CZP are supplementary, CZPY is a cyclic quadrilateral \Rightarrow \angle CPY = \gamma.

As \angle PAY =\angle PUY, APYU is a cyclic quadrilateral \Rightarrow \angle UYA = \beta.

Now \angle ETP =180-(\alpha +\beta + \gamma) \Rightarrow \angle PTY = \alpha +\beta +\gamma \Rightarrow \angle TPY=90-(\alpha+\beta+\gamma)

Now as \angle BUZ=\angle BPZ and \angle BUZ=90 - \alpha, \angle BPZ = 90 - \alpha.
Let \angle CPZ= \mu. Now \angle CPZ+\angle TPC=\angle BUZ \Rightarrow \mu + 90-(\alpha +\beta)=90-\alpha \Rightarrow \mu = \beta \Rightarrow \angle CPZ = \beta \Rightarrow CYZ = \beta.

As \angle UYP+\angle PYZ = \beta +90 + 90-\beta = 180, U, \ Y and Z must be colinear.

QED

Thanks for any feedback.
 

Attachments

  • Simson line.JPG
    Simson line.JPG
    25.1 KB · Views: 514
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Just bumping this... Hoping someone will take a look. I really appreciate it.
 
Where is \angle APX or rather point X.
 
I thought I had switched all the X's with U's as my program wouldn't accept X as a vertex. It's really U. It's changed now.
 
What program are you using?
 
Geogebra. It's great. It's free and our textbooks webpage has a link to it.

If you want it..: here is a direct link to the setup file.
http://www.geogebra.org/download/InstData/Windows/NoVM/GeoGebra_3_0_0_0_Release_Candidate_1.exe
 
Woah! This program is cool ... thanks! I wish I knew more geometry to help you, lol. I'm actually self-studying it at the moment, but you're further ahead of me in the game so :( I'm sure someone else will respond in a few!
 
It's supposed to be Simson's line, and not Simons line.
 
PZ is perpendicular to BC, then angle(BZP) is naturally 90 degree, no need for any assumption!
 
Back
Top