Is My Reimann Sum Solution Correct for 6/(1+2x) from 0 to 2 with 4 Subintervals?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Qube
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sum Term
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around approximating the integral of the function 6/(1+2x) from 0 to 2 using Riemann sums with 4 subintervals and left endpoints. Participants are exploring the setup and calculations involved in this approximation method.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the Riemann sum and questions the correctness of their approach, particularly regarding the absence of the N term in their sum and the general validity of their calculations. Other participants provide feedback on the nature of left and right Riemann sums and the implications of finite sums as approximations to the integral.

Discussion Status

Some participants affirm the original poster's calculations and reasoning, while others clarify the relationship between finite sums and the limit process in Riemann sums. The conversation reflects a mix of validation and exploration of concepts without reaching a definitive consensus on all points raised.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses a desire for confirmation of their understanding and correctness, indicating a learning process in grasping Riemann sum notation and its applications.

Qube
Gold Member
Messages
461
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Approximate the value of the integral of 6/(1+2x) with respect to x from 0 to 2. Use 4 subintervals of equal width and use the left endpoints.

Homework Equations



delta x = (b-a)/N

The Attempt at a Solution



The integral is the sum of 6/(1+i) from i = 0 to i = N-1 or 3 all multiplied by delta x, or 1/2.

This yields:

(1/2)(6 + 3 + 2 + (6/4))

= 3 + 3/2 + 1 + 3/4 = 4 + 1.5 + 0.75 = 5.5 + 0.75 = 6.25 = 25/4.

1) This is correct without the N term in the sum, right? I'm wondering because usually I have to take the limit as N approaches infinity but the N doesn't exist here, since N has already been defined.

2) Also is my work correct in general? I'm still getting a hang of this Reimann sum notation with the indices and n subintervals and the x star notation. I'll have to learn Latex another day!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Qube said:

Homework Statement



Approximate the value of the integral of 6/(1+2x) with respect to x from 0 to 2. Use 4 subintervals of equal width and use the left endpoints.

Homework Equations



delta x = (b-a)/N

The Attempt at a Solution



The integral is the sum of 6/(1+i) from i = 0 to i = N-1 or 3 all multiplied by delta x, or 1/2.

This yields:

(1/2)(6 + 3 + 2 + (6/4))

= 3 + 3/2 + 1 + 3/4 = 4 + 1.5 + 0.75 = 5.5 + 0.75 = 6.25 = 25/4.

1) This is correct without the N term in the sum, right? I'm wondering because usually I have to take the limit as N approaches infinity but the N doesn't exist here, since N has already been defined.

2) Also is my work correct in general? I'm still getting a hang of this Reimann sum notation with the indices and n subintervals and the x star notation. I'll have to learn Latex another day!

Yes, it's fine. And your work is fine in general. I don't know why you are asking all of these questions. As far as Riemann sums go, you can do a left sum, in which case i=N doesn't appear or a right sum in which case i=0 doesn't appear. These finite sums are just approximations to the true integral which you get by taking N->infinity. In which case it shouldn't matter whether it's left or right or something else.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thanks again! Well, you guys helped me get a perfect score on my last chem test when the average was a 68% and the historic average was in the 50s. I got help here for free while my friends paid for help and still did dismally, or completely failed. I just want to make sure I'm right because I'd like to have a repeat performance on my calculus test! On the last calc test I actually scored over a 100 while the average was in the 70s, thanks again to PF.

Physics Forum is a grade saver! Thanks again to everyone who helped me and keeps helping me :)!
 
Qube said:
Thanks again! Well, you guys helped me get a perfect score on my last chem test when the average was a 68% and the historic average was in the 50s. I got help here for free while my friends paid for help and still did dismally, or completely failed. I just want to make sure I'm right because I'd like to have a repeat performance on my calculus test! On the last calc test I actually scored over a 100 while the average was in the 70s, thanks again to PF.

Physics Forum is a grade saver! Thanks again to everyone who helped me and keeps helping me :)!

Scoring over 100% is certainly worth a mention. At this point you should be getting a little more confident. Congratulations!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K