Is Newton's 3rd law sufficient to explain buoyancy force?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether Newton's Third Law adequately explains buoyancy force. While some students argue that the upward force from water results from the downward force exerted by a floating object, this explanation is deemed insufficient. A more accurate understanding involves recognizing that buoyancy arises from a pressure differential, which is influenced by variable depth in a gravitational field. The upward force on the object is a result of the greater pressure at the bottom compared to the top, leading to a net buoyant force. Clarifying these concepts is essential to prevent misunderstanding of Newton's Third Law in relation to buoyancy.
PhysicsNowApple
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I assigned a question: Explain the physics mechanism that results in the buoyancy force.

Some students replied: The floating object is interacting with the water. Therefore it exerts a downward force on the water. The water then exerts an upward force on the object due to Newton's Third Law. This force balances the weight of the object. I was looking for the standard: variable depth pressure causes a pressure differential that results in the buoyancy force.

Now I feel that their explanation is not sufficient but I was wondering how to go about addressing their answer because I feel like if I am not careful I might obfuscate their understanding of Newton's 3rd Law.Thank you,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The 3rd law just states that the force of the water on the object is the negative of the force of the object on the water. To actually explain buoyancy you need the pressure differential, which in turn results from assuming a hydrostatic situation in a gravitational field.
 
  • Like
Likes Daniel Sellers
Orodruin said:
The 3rd law just states that the force of the water on the object is the negative of the force of the object on the water. To actually explain buoyancy you need the pressure differential, which in turn results from assuming a hydrostatic situation in a gravitational field.

Hmmm, so perhaps to address this I should point out that technically the water is exerting a force along all points on the object, so using Newton's third law I cannot find a net force upward. Only by using the pressure differential, do we see that the forces exerted on the top of the object are not as large as the forces exerted on the bottom of the object and then we are able to get a net buoyant force?
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buoyancy said:
The buoyancy force exerted on a body can now be calculated easily, since the internal pressure of the fluid is known. The force exerted on the body can be calculated by integrating the stress tensor over the surface of the body which is in contact with the fluid:

d53e8b6668b8f0850ba54ec5999a6b04d8256cb4

The surface integral can be transformed into a volume integral with the help of the Gauss theorem:

59aa810e63b67d23daabe691fbd06e8879d425b5

where V is the measure of the volume in contact with the fluid, that is the volume of the submerged part of the body.
 
PhysicsNowApple said:
The water then exerts an upward force on the object due to Newton's Third Law.
It is vital not to confuse the idea of third law pairs and Forces in Equilibrium (which is a special case).
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top