Is Null Physics a Legitimate Theory or Just a Crackpot Idea?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the book "Null Physics," which is criticized as a crackpot theory lacking academic credibility. The book is marketed to a non-scientific audience, raising concerns about its legitimacy and the decision of platforms like Scientific American to promote it. Participants express frustration over the absence of substantive information regarding the theory's basis and its claims, noting that it has not undergone peer review, which limits the ability to discuss it in academic contexts. The conversation highlights a desire for more information while emphasizing skepticism about the theory's validity.
maverick_starstrider
Messages
1,118
Reaction score
7
Hey,

I've seen this "Null Physics" book advertised in magazines like Scientific American (which is a rather shameful move on SciAm's part) and it basically seems like some guy's got some crackpot theory and is trying to circumvent any actual academic scrutiny that would come by publishing in a journal and is simply peddling it straight to the 'what the BLEEP do we know' type crowd.
However, I am a bit curious. I can't seem to find any information about this theory (other then buying the book of course). Does anyone know anything about it (i.e. what the basis of the 'theory' and basically how out there is it).

(I know this has been discussed before but there doesn't actually seem to be any information about it).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ya I read that but I'm just a little curious if anyone can actually provide some substantive information on what its basis is and how it goes about getting 'proven' in the book.
 
P.S. I'm surprised there's not a Wikipedia article about it yet. This things been around for awhile.
 
I'm afraid that, as per PF rules, we cannot discuss material that has not been peer reviewed. Thus, as I'm sure you were expecting (judging from the result of the other thread) this thread will be closed.
 

Thread 'Predictions for the Nobel Prize in Physics 2025'

Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
View full post »
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'

Thread 'My experience as a hostage'

I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
View full post »

Similar threads

Physics Avoiding the Crackpot Trap: Tips for Amateur Physicists with Graduate Knowledge
Replies
26
Views
4K
Where to Discuss a Unified Theory of Energy on Physics Forums?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Computer Communication Theory & Information Theory - A name change?
Replies
3
Views
1K
Admissions Statement of purpose critique request (high-energy theory PhD)
Replies
0
Views
2K
I Symmetry of motion in the special theory of relativity
Replies
36
Views
2K
Medical Are there theories of medicine that are under the umbrella of Physical Sciences?
Replies
6
Views
2K
How to avoid stealing of my idea before publishing it?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Is Physics Essays Journal Just Full of Crackpot Theories?
Replies
7
Views
11K
Different conceptions of pop physics
Replies
14
Views
2K
Schools Theoretical Physics Masters Course in Spain or Italy?
Replies
4
Views
186

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top