Is Our Universe Just a Balloon in an Infinite Matrix?

  • Thread starter Thread starter megacal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinite
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the concept that our universe might be just one of many "balloons" within an infinite matrix, suggesting the possibility of larger structures beyond our observable universe. It also considers the idea of infinitely smaller particles that could compose fundamental particles like the Boson, raising questions about the limits of our understanding of size in the universe. The observable universe is acknowledged as vast, but its unobservable extent remains unknown. The Planck length is highlighted as the smallest measurable unit, beyond which current physics cannot provide insight. The analogy of a bubble within foam is proposed to illustrate the complexity and interconnectedness of these cosmic structures.
megacal
Messages
82
Reaction score
16
Since we can only see out into space (or back in time is it were) a finite distance,
isn't it possible that our universe balloon is just part of a matrix of "balloons", and that there could be infinitely increasing levels of magnitude larger structures?

And in the opposite direction, couldn't there be smaller particles that make up the Boson et al, which in turn are also made up of smaller particles, etc, etc.?

How do we know what the limits are?
 
Space news on Phys.org
We know the size of the observable universe. It's very big. We do not know the size of the unobservable universe because ... it's unobservable. On the small end there is this unit of measure called the Planck length. It is not possible to see stuff smaller than that, not because of instrument limitations, but, because of the laws of physics.
 
My intuition tells me it's probably so, since we see order
at every extreme. Things look very chaotic
until we back away and see the "Big Picture".

Perhaps a bubble would be a better analogy than a balloon.

A bubble in a whisp of foam, on the shore of a planet, circling a star in
the spiral arm of a galaxy, in a cluster, on the surface of a bubble, in a whisp of foam...
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...

Similar threads

Back
Top