Is physics being recorded in any really hard-to-destroy way?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Doofy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
Recent discussions highlight concerns about the fragility of recorded knowledge, primarily stored on easily destructible mediums like paper and hard drives. The potential for natural disasters to erase centuries of progress raises questions about the need for more durable records, similar to archaeological finds that have lasted thousands of years. Suggestions include creating a permanent record that could transcend language barriers, possibly through diagrams illustrating sound formation. While backups of information exist globally, the effectiveness of these measures in the face of a global cataclysm remains debatable. The conversation underscores the importance of preserving practical knowledge for future civilizations.
Doofy
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
In recent centuries a relative handful of brilliant people have devoted their lives to figuring out some very difficult things and developing some ingenious tools to do so along the way. However, as far as I know, the only places this work has been recorded is on things that are easily destroyed - paper, hard-drives and human brains. None of those things will stand the test of time. One natural disaster and all this progress could be wiped out in one fell swoop (which is obviously not unprecedented), leaving future civilizations having to rediscover things from scratch.

Then you look at what archaeologists have found that have taught us about the past, stuff that has lasted tens of thousands of years. Stuff made out of much more durable materials. Shouldn't some committee be looking to make a more permanent record in the same way? Or is this being done already?

I'm aware that a future civilization might not speak any language that exists today, but perhaps that could be overcome, if a language/alphabet came with diagrams of how to form certain sounds with your mouth or something. What do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Doofy said:
In recent centuries a relative handful of brilliant people have devoted their lives to figuring out some very difficult things and developing some ingenious tools to do so along the way. However, as far as I know, the only places this work has been recorded is on things that are easily destroyed - paper, hard-drives and human brains. None of those things will stand the test of time. One natural disaster and all this progress could be wiped out in one fell swoop (which is obviously not unprecedented), leaving future civilizations having to rediscover things from scratch.

Then you look at what archaeologists have found that have taught us about the past, stuff that has lasted tens of thousands of years. Stuff made out of much more durable materials. Shouldn't some committee be looking to make a more permanent record in the same way? Or is this being done already?

I'm aware that a future civilization might not speak any language that exists today, but perhaps that could be overcome, if a language/alphabet came with diagrams of how to form certain sounds with your mouth or something. What do you think?

If you haven't read it already, "A Canticle for Leibowitz" is a really imaginitive rendering of the problem of preserving knowledge.
 
I haven't read it, no. What does it suggest and is it happening?
 
Doofy said:
I haven't read it, no. What does it suggest and is it happening?

It is cold-war era science fiction. Happily, the world that it imagined never came to pass, but it deals with the fragility of knowledge and society in an interesting way.
 
The best way to ensure longevity of information is to make backups. Since all of the important ideas have thousands or millions of copies, residing all over the globe, that's about as well as the longevity can be assured. If a global cataclysm wiped-out all of that information, the loss of that information would be way down on our list of problems.
 
  • Like
Likes Intrastellar
russ_watters said:
If a global cataclysm wiped-out all of that information, the loss of that information would be way down on our list of problems.
The information how to make various tools, chemicals and other things with basic equipment or leftover equipment of our civilization would certainly be interesting.
Recent publications do not help there, of course - no one cares about the mass of a Higgs boson if you want to make steel tools from scratch.
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
Back
Top