Is Physics Right for Me If I Find the Basics Boring?

  • Thread starter Thread starter divexo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
Exploring physics can initially seem unexciting, especially when starting with fundamental concepts like motion and mechanics. Many newcomers find these basics dry, which can lead to doubts about their interest in the subject. However, a solid foundation in these fundamental topics is crucial for understanding more complex theories like string theory and advanced concepts such as spacetime cloaks. It's important to recognize that string theory represents only a small fraction of the broader field of physics. A genuine interest in physics often stems from a desire to comprehend how the universe operates, rather than just focusing on the more glamorous topics presented in popular science literature. Therefore, while the initial stages may feel tedious, they are essential for a deeper appreciation of the subject.
divexo
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I've just thought of how interesting parts of physics sounds, such as elements of string theory (the broad idea, not indepth about differing dimensions - imagining the tenth dimension, probably a really noob book around here haha) among other time/space topics, and would love to know how some of the new research like 'spacetime cloak' work - so freakn cool.
Never really done any physics before, so decided to start reading about the basics so i can explore the interesting topics later, but i find motion and most of the basics i came across quite boring (fundamentals of physics extended book, flicked through the topics in the first half, and didn't seem to find any appealing to read over), and not too keen on going over them.

Does this mean i won't like physics then, considering all the initial topics seem so dry..? Not for me? Or is this initial bump happen for all..?

Thanksssss

Divexo
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to get your feet wet before you jump off the board into the deep end. If you haven't done any physics before you need to start at the beginning.
 
You've got about 5 or 6 years of physics to get through before you can start really chipping away at string theory. Good luck!
 
divexo said:
Does this mean i won't like physics then, considering all the initial topics seem so dry..? Not for me? Or is this initial bump happen for all..?

It means that 'physics' probably isn't what you think it is - string theory certainly isn't what you think it is, either. You might have a general understanding of popular science concepts, but won't have a clue about the actual physics and what it's describing.

If you want to study physics so you can look at string theory and such flamboyant topics, you'll probably just be disappointed. It isn't an 'initial bump for all' in that I chose to study physics because I like understanding how things work. Physics is a sort-of general knowledge degree where you'll find out, piece by piece, how our universe works. This includes things like mechanics, thermodynamics and optics - the topics that you have probably found to be boring. String theory is a tiny area of a tiny part of physics - so the goal of a physics degree doesn't lead up to the exotic topics you'll read in popular science books.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Back
Top