Is Plasma Physics Still a Viable Field for Research?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the viability of plasma physics as a field for research, particularly in light of perceptions that it may be stagnant or lacking groundbreaking developments. Participants explore various applications of plasma physics, including fusion research and accelerator physics, while expressing concerns about funding and the future of the field.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express the view that plasma physics is perceived as "relatively dead" by undergraduates, suggesting a lack of recent groundbreaking work.
  • Others argue that significant research is ongoing in plasma wakefields, particularly in accelerator physics, which could lead to advancements in particle accelerators.
  • One participant notes that while there is promising technology in plasma wakefields, it still has challenges to overcome before becoming mainstream.
  • Another participant emphasizes that public opinion may not reflect the actual state of scientific research, indicating that non-experts may lack the necessary knowledge to form accurate assessments.
  • Concerns are raised regarding the funding situation for fusion plasma research, with references to the Department of Energy's budget allocations potentially impacting domestic research opportunities.
  • A participant mentions that the perception of stagnation may be more applicable to fusion research specifically, while other areas of plasma physics remain active.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the overall state of plasma physics. While some acknowledge ongoing research and applications, others highlight funding issues and a perception of stagnation, particularly in fusion research.

Contextual Notes

Limitations in the discussion include assumptions about the knowledge of undergraduates regarding the field, the specific focus on fusion research versus other applications, and the implications of funding decisions on research opportunities.

pretzel
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The consensus among a number of my (undergrad) peers is that the field of plasma physics is relatively dead and that nothing ground breaking has been done a long while. I would have liked to go to grad school for this but not as much if this is true.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pretzel said:
The consensus among a number of my (undergrad) peers is that the field of plasma physics is relatively dead and that nothing ground breaking has been done a long while. Is this true?
Besides the obvious area of fusion research, one of the areas of physics that are actively using the knowledge of plasma is in accelerator physics! Various groups, such as the ones at USC, UCLA, SLAC/Stanford, UC-Berkeley, etc. are using plasma wakefields to generate high gradient acceleration. If they succeed, this will be the mechanism for the next generation of particle accelerators, especially for high energy physics.

Or maybe those undergrads don't consider these to be "alive" and "ground breaking"?

Zz.
 
ZapperZ is right. There is a lot of research being done in plasma wakefields, both in north america and abroad (Germany etc.). Very promising looking technology, but I think it still has a bit of a way to go. It is an interesting field though! The accelerating gradients look to be orders of magnitude larger than that of conventional accelerators, something like 10 GeV/m.
 
In general ordinary people do not have the knowledge necessary to form a scientific consensus. Including out of field PhDs. So don't worry about what they say.
 
ZapperZ said:
Besides the obvious area of fusion research, one of the areas of physics that are actively using the knowledge of plasma is in accelerator physics! Various groups, such as the ones at USC, UCLA, SLAC/Stanford, UC-Berkeley, etc. are using plasma wakefields to generate high gradient acceleration. If they succeed, this will be the mechanism for the next generation of particle accelerators, especially for high energy physics.

Or maybe those undergrads don't consider these to be "alive" and "ground breaking"?

Zz.

Not to mention plasmas are used extensively in electronic device fabrication.
 
I'm assuming your friends were referring to *fusion* plasma research, which is indeed having trouble right now. I went to an undergrad that has a very strong fusion program, and so though I wasn't in the field, I have a lot of friends heavily involved.

The way one friend of mine explained it to me, the DOE has a set amount that it will spend on fusion regardless of developments. Since ITER is a growing project, the DOE is funneling money into France and US groups researching for it at the expense of domestic research. My friend was accepted to grad school at MIT but was told that there was no money for plasma physics anymore so he went elsewhere, and he was a theorist (I've heard that they will continue to reject plasma applicants this year). Many are aware that Alcator C-Mod at MIT is shutting down as per the federal budget:
http://www.fusionfuture.org/
(the above link probably has all the relevant info you're really looking for)

This doesn't mean the field is dead! But it is a small and relatively insular field within physics (as my friends will admit).
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K