Is Plasma Physics Still a Viable Field for Research?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights a perception among undergraduates that plasma physics is stagnant, particularly in fusion research. However, significant advancements are being made in plasma wakefield acceleration, with institutions like USC, UCLA, SLAC, and UC-Berkeley exploring high-gradient acceleration techniques that could revolutionize particle accelerators. Despite the promising developments in this area, there is a concern about funding and resource allocation, especially with projects like ITER drawing attention and financial support away from domestic fusion research. The field is described as small and insular, which may contribute to the perception of inactivity. Overall, while challenges exist, particularly in fusion, other areas of plasma physics remain vibrant and innovative.
pretzel
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The consensus among a number of my (undergrad) peers is that the field of plasma physics is relatively dead and that nothing ground breaking has been done a long while. I would have liked to go to grad school for this but not as much if this is true.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pretzel said:
The consensus among a number of my (undergrad) peers is that the field of plasma physics is relatively dead and that nothing ground breaking has been done a long while. Is this true?
Besides the obvious area of fusion research, one of the areas of physics that are actively using the knowledge of plasma is in accelerator physics! Various groups, such as the ones at USC, UCLA, SLAC/Stanford, UC-Berkeley, etc. are using plasma wakefields to generate high gradient acceleration. If they succeed, this will be the mechanism for the next generation of particle accelerators, especially for high energy physics.

Or maybe those undergrads don't consider these to be "alive" and "ground breaking"?

Zz.
 
ZapperZ is right. There is a lot of research being done in plasma wakefields, both in north america and abroad (Germany etc.). Very promising looking technology, but I think it still has a bit of a way to go. It is an interesting field though! The accelerating gradients look to be orders of magnitude larger than that of conventional accelerators, something like 10 GeV/m.
 
In general ordinary people do not have the knowledge necessary to form a scientific consensus. Including out of field PhDs. So don't worry about what they say.
 
ZapperZ said:
Besides the obvious area of fusion research, one of the areas of physics that are actively using the knowledge of plasma is in accelerator physics! Various groups, such as the ones at USC, UCLA, SLAC/Stanford, UC-Berkeley, etc. are using plasma wakefields to generate high gradient acceleration. If they succeed, this will be the mechanism for the next generation of particle accelerators, especially for high energy physics.

Or maybe those undergrads don't consider these to be "alive" and "ground breaking"?

Zz.

Not to mention plasmas are used extensively in electronic device fabrication.
 
I'm assuming your friends were referring to *fusion* plasma research, which is indeed having trouble right now. I went to an undergrad that has a very strong fusion program, and so though I wasn't in the field, I have a lot of friends heavily involved.

The way one friend of mine explained it to me, the DOE has a set amount that it will spend on fusion regardless of developments. Since ITER is a growing project, the DOE is funneling money into France and US groups researching for it at the expense of domestic research. My friend was accepted to grad school at MIT but was told that there was no money for plasma physics anymore so he went elsewhere, and he was a theorist (I've heard that they will continue to reject plasma applicants this year). Many are aware that Alcator C-Mod at MIT is shutting down as per the federal budget:
http://www.fusionfuture.org/
(the above link probably has all the relevant info you're really looking for)

This doesn't mean the field is dead! But it is a small and relatively insular field within physics (as my friends will admit).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top