Is Propulsion Physics Part of Nuclear Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter robbie.kpm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Propulsion
AI Thread Summary
Propulsion physics primarily falls under classical Newtonian physics, focusing on how forces cause movement. While rockets are a specialization of this field, they can incorporate elements of nuclear physics if nuclear reactions are involved, though current rockets do not utilize this technology. Concepts for nuclear propulsion, such as the NERVA prototype and Project Orion, have been explored but face significant engineering and public perception challenges. The discussion highlights the potential for future advancements in nuclear propulsion, despite current limitations and political factors that have hindered development. Overall, propulsion physics remains grounded in classical mechanics, with nuclear applications being theoretical at this stage.
robbie.kpm
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
This is probably the wrong section for this question but what area of physics is propulsion physics. For rockets and stuff. Would that be considered nuclear physics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, the physics of propulsion is classical Newtonian physics.
Apply a known force to something and it moves in a predictable way.
Rocketry is a just a specialisation within that.
 
It has elements of nuclear physics if the suggested rocket type uses nuclear reactions. No existing rocket does that, but some concepts do.
The motion of the rocket is purely classical mechanics.
 
mfb said:
It has elements of nuclear physics if the suggested rocket type uses nuclear reactions. No existing rocket does that, but some concepts do.
I have heard of such concepts, but I don't feel safe with the idea of being accelerated by carefully timed nuclear detonations.
 
But you feel comfortable being sustained and nourished by a huge continuous runaway fusion reaction at the center of our solar system? :wink:

BTW, they also have concepts and even successfully tested nuclear rockets that work on a controlled reaction, such as in a power plant.
 
The Sun is not a runaway reaction it's fairly stable and predictable and is 150 million km away - but even then it emits occasional outbursts of matter and radiation which are not predictable, and definitely hazardous to be exposed to.
Having said that though, if a fusion reactor could be be made small enough, and we had a technology that would convert it's output into directional thrust, and the payload could be adequately shielded from neutron bombardment - well it might be runner, but that's a lot of tech which is way beyond our present abilities.

The nuclear rocket concepts I have heard of so far involve something along the lines of detonating several fission bombs in sequence behind the rocket which would then 'surf' along on the shockwaves created. That's what I'm not too keen on the idea of.
 
 
I had not come across that one before but it does sound more realistic than the shockwave surfing concept.
I did a quick search and discovered that a proof of concept NERVA prototype was built, which although it had some engineering hurdles to overcome these were not insurmountable.
It's not too clear from my quick search as to why the project was abandoned.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
The shockwave surfing concept was actually surprisingly well developed, but got axed because of the partial test ban treaty. The NERVA I'm not sure either...some political reasons I guess. In the end, public opinion is that nuclear = bad, and therefore either one has a slim chance of being resurrected anytime soon.
 
  • #11
rootone said:
I had not come across that one before but it does sound more realistic than the shockwave surfing concept.
I did a quick search and discovered that a proof of concept NERVA prototype was built, which although it had some engineering hurdles to overcome these were not insurmountable.
It's not too clear from my quick search as to why the project was abandoned.

I'm not sure which ideas you've come across in the past, but here are several:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Orion_(nuclear_propulsion)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Daedalus
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Longshot

There was an interesting experiment back in the 60's I think called Project Pluto to develop a nuclear powered cruise missile. It didn't use nuclear explosions to power it, but it used a nuclear reactor to provide power to a continuously running ramjet engine. Though this isn't what you were talking about earlier, it still would technically fall under the description 'nuclear powered propulsion'. If you look at it from that perspective, it opens up some other options that maybe you hadn't considered:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Prometheus
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Pluto
 
Back
Top