Is quantum information/computers more similar to computer science or physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Substance D
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the intersection of physics and quantum information, particularly for those considering graduate work in this area. A participant expresses interest in quantum information but has reservations about computer science, specifically its theoretical aspects. Another contributor, who has experience with a thesis advisor specializing in quantum information, clarifies that their research focuses on matrix factorization and emphasizes that quantum information studies can be largely mathematical and theoretical, often without the need for coding or algorithms. This suggests that individuals with a strong mathematical background, such as physics majors, may find quantum information appealing despite their aversion to traditional computer science.
Substance D
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Hey,

Is anyone here involved in this, or doing their grad work in this area? I was wondering how similar it is to actual computer science. I'm currently a Physics major and was interested in this field of study, but I really dislike computer science (not writing code, just the theory of it all).

Thanks

D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My thesis advisor is a researcher in quantum information. I think he is an expert in matrices and applid algebra. His research mainly focus on factorisation of matrices. I also audited his quantum information class, and it was nothing about matrices manipulation.
 
so it doesn't involve any coding or algorithims or anything like that?
 
that was like a survey class. Moreover, it was purely mathematical, with no computer coding at all.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top