Is R={0, 2, 4, 6, 8} a Field under Addition and Multiplication Modulo 10?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The set R={0, 2, 4, 6, 8} under addition and multiplication modulo 10 is indeed a field. The unity element is 6, and the multiplicative inverses are confirmed: 2 is paired with 8, 4 with itself, and 6 with itself. The commutative properties are established through the Cayley table, demonstrating that addition and multiplication are commutative and associative. Additionally, the existence of additive inverses is validated, confirming that R satisfies all field properties.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of field theory in abstract algebra
  • Familiarity with modular arithmetic, specifically modulo 10
  • Knowledge of commutative rings and their properties
  • Ability to construct and interpret Cayley tables
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of commutative rings in detail
  • Learn about constructing Cayley tables for various algebraic structures
  • Explore the concept of multiplicative inverses in modular arithmetic
  • Investigate other sets that may form fields under different operations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying abstract algebra, educators teaching field theory, and anyone interested in the properties of algebraic structures in modular arithmetic.

cmajor47
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let R={0, 2, 4, 6, 8} under addition and multiplication modulo 10. Prove that R is a field.


Homework Equations


A field is a commutative ring with unity in which every nonzero element is a unit.


The Attempt at a Solution


I know that the unity of R is 6, and that the multiplicative inverse of 2 is 8, of 3 is 2, of 4 is 4, and of 6 is 6.
So I've shown that each nonzero element is a unit.
I'm not sure how to go about showing that R is a commutative ring.
To show the commutative part, I'm guessing that I can just do out the Cayley table of R.
I don't know how to show that R is a ring without going through all of the characteristics of a ring though. I don't think I need to do that but I'm not sure.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which properties are non-obvious?
 
Well I can clearly see that a+b=b+a, (a+b)+c=a+(b+c), a(bc)=(ab)c, a(b+c)=ab+ac, and (b+c)a=ba+ca, and that there is an additive identity 0 st a+0=a for all a in R
So, I guess the non-obvious property is that there is an element -a in R such that a+(-a)=0, but is this property even true?
 
I claim that what -[/color]a needs to be is obvious, and thus that property holds depending on whether or not that is actually an element of R.


(I use red to indicate it's the putative negation operation on R, rather than the negation operation on the integers modulo 10 which I will express in black)
 
Then I'm not sure what the non-obvious property is.
 
I am hoping that while you found the existence of additive inverses non-obvious earlier, that from my hint you now find it obvious -- or can at least prove it even if it isn't obvious.

So, if that was the only field property that wasn't clear to you, does that mean you are now happy that it's a field?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K