Abstract Algebra: Rings, Unit Elements, Fields

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of rings in abstract algebra, specifically focusing on the operations defined for a set R. Participants are tasked with demonstrating that (R,*,+) forms a ring and identifying unit elements for a specific operation. The original poster expresses difficulty in understanding how to approach these problems, particularly in relation to isomorphisms and ring axioms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to verify ring properties such as associativity and the existence of an identity element. There are attempts to clarify the operations defined and how to show they meet the ring axioms. Questions arise regarding the notation used for operations and the process of finding unit elements.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to demonstrate associativity and the need for distinct symbols for different operations. There is acknowledgment of the original poster's progress in showing that the structure is an abelian group, but uncertainty remains about finding inverses and unit elements. Multiple interpretations of the operations are being explored, and productive suggestions have been made regarding notation and approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of working with non-standard operations and the lack of examples in the referenced textbook. There is a specific mention of needing to clarify the identity element under one of the operations before proceeding with finding inverses.

S_Manifesto
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
1) Show that (R,*,+) is a ring, where (x*y)=x+y+2 and (x+y)=2xy+4x+4y+6. Find the set of unit elements for the second operation.

I understand that the Ring Axioms is 1. (R,+) is an albein group. 2. Multiplication is associative and 3. Multiplication distributes. I just don't understand how to go about this. A First Course in Abstract Algebra by John Fraleigh fails to show any examples of this type.

2) Let f: Z[√d]→M be an application such that f)x+y√d=A where
[x y]
A = Matrix[yd x]

Show that f is an isomorphism of rings.

I understand that I have to check the conditions of it being isomorphic, but once again the book does not give examples of how to do so. It's hard to attempt problems when I don't know where to begin.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It will help avoid confusion if you adopt different symbols for different operations instead of using + for the ring operation and for normal addition.
Let's start with showing * is associative, i.e. (a*b)*c = a*(b*c). Write that out using the definition of * you are given.
 
haruspex said:
It will help avoid confusion if you adopt different symbols for different operations instead of using + for the ring operation and for normal addition.
Let's start with showing * is associative, i.e. (a*b)*c = a*(b*c). Write that out using the definition of * you are given.

What I came up with was (x*y)=(y*x) → x+y+2 = y+x+2 to show it's albein.
x+(y+z)=(x+y)+z → x+(2yz+4y+4z+6)=(2xy+4x+4y+6)+z and got 4xyz+8xy+8xz+8yz+16x+16y+16z+30 = 4xyz+8xy+8xz+8yz+16x+16y+16z+30

For x+(y*z)=(x+y)*(x+z) → x+(y+z+2)=(2xy+4x+4y+6)*(2xz+4x+4z+6) and got 2xy+2xz+8x+4y+4z+14 = 2xy+2xz+8x+4y+4z+14
 
Looks fine (though I still wish you'd adopted a different symbol for one of the pluses).
 
haruspex said:
Looks fine (though I still wish you'd adopted a different symbol for one of the pluses).

The question has a plus with a circle around it, I don't know how to make that symbol.

But that's correct?
 
Yes, your solution looks fine.
If you click 'go advanced' then the capital sigma symbol from the options that appear you get a LaTex reference panel. In there, open Binary Operators. But for the purpose of the thread, you could have just chosen some character like %, provided you explained it.
 
S_Manifesto said:
The question has a plus with a circle around it, I don't know how to make that symbol.

But that's correct?

Here ...

 


S_Manifesto said:
Show that (R,*,\oplus) is a ring, where x*y=x+y+2 and x\oplusy=2xy+4x+4y+6. Find the set of unit elements of the second operation.

I've showed that it is a ring, showing it is Albein, Associative, and Distributive, but I do not know how to find the inverse to find the unit elements.

All I know is that I need to replace y with x'

You meant the first operation *, right? If you've shown it's an abelian group then you already know there are inverses under \oplus. You should probably find the identity under * in your ring first. What is it?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K