Is Relativistic Electromagnetism Affecting a Test Charge Above a Moving Wire?

Jimmy87
Messages
692
Reaction score
19
I have recently come across relativistic electromagnetism so I am very new to it. The situation described to me was one where a positive test charge moves above a wire with a velocity V which matches the current in the wire in both magnitude and direction. Apparently, from the test charge's reference frame, the attractive force on it is strictly Coulmobic owing to the fact that from its own reference frame there is no relative motion between itself and the flowing positive charges in the wire, is that right? That seems so strange! Can you really say from the test charge's frame that there is no magnetic force even though its moving? The electrostatic attraction is supposedly caused by length contraction of the negative charges which are stationary in the other reference frame but have relative motion from the test charge's frame. How can you get length contraction to be this significant at such low velocities (i.e. drift velocity)? Also, does this relativistic attractive Coulomb force exactly match the magnetic force in terms of magnitude? Is all this phenomena really true, i.e. can it be proven that a charge moving outside a wire really feels relativistic effects? Any help answering these questions is greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is an excerpt from Purcell discussing how the magnetic force arises from the electrostatic force and relativity.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Jimmy87 said:
Can you really say from the test charge's frame that there is no magnetic force even though its moving?
But the statement "it's moving" has no absolute meaning. In the rest frame of the charge it is of course at rest; in the rest frame of some other observer the charge may be in motion but the latter is not any more special than the former.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top