Is Space Continuous or Quantized?

jadrian
Messages
142
Reaction score
0
or is space itseld quantized meaning an object moving from a to b
would in some way look like A \/\/\/\/\0/\/\/\/ B

or is it smooth and continuous like A--------0------B

?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We aren't sure yet; some modern theories lean towards quantized. Of course, there's no huge problems taking it as continuous for classical systems.
 
jadrian said:
or is space itseld quantized meaning an object moving from a to b
would in some way look like A \/\/\/\/\0/\/\/\/ B

or is it smooth and continuous like A--------0------B

?

As Pythagorean said, nobody knows, but it's a commonly asked question and if you do a forum search you'll find a lot of discussion on it (the bottom line of which is, of course, nobody knows)
 
Last edited:
Space is currently modeled as continuous. There are hypothesis that quantizing it may lead to better models, but that idea is still being worked on.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top