Is Space-Time Non-Commutative? Understanding Non-Commutative Geometry in Physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter black hole 123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometry
black hole 123
Messages
36
Reaction score
2
ive been reading about people thinking sub Planck scale spacetime is "non commutative". i have a vague idea of non commutative geometry mathematically, but there's no "space" in non commutative geometry so how can SPACEtime be a non commutative ring?

i thought non commutative geometry was just a mathematical generalization of normal (commutative) algebraic geometry. I am not a physics students so I am not in a position to judge, but i find many things in math applied to physics with absolutely NO physical manifestation/interpretation

sorry if this sounds stupid
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Non-commutative geometry, in a nutshell, means that distance is a path dependent quantity and that for example, the distance from X to Y via a path, and the trip back may have different distances.

A non-fundamental example would be the geography of getting from one place to another in a city with lots of one way streets and irregular loops (e.g. Boston). The distance from your house to your office may be different from the distance from your office to your house.

Obviously, when this is operating at a fundamental level as a basic element of the structure of space-time, getting your head around the idea is much harder. But, this is the idea at its most basis level.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top