Is Spherically Symmetric Spacetime Algebraically Special?

  • Thread starter Thread starter afs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Classification
afs
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I've been reading about Petrov classification and I have a question (in fact this is an exercise from Wald's General Relativity): How can we prove that spherically symmetric spacetimes are algebraically special, using the fact that the Weyl tensor, as the principal null directions are invariant over isometries? I've look over the internet, but I coudn't find a clue.
Thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I just got one insight for this question, please report me if I am wrong. Spherically symmetric spacetimes possesses a smooth two-parameter group of isometries, and a single vector can be transformed in any other, "rotated" one. As this smooth-parametrized isometries leave the null directions invariant, the two-dimensional region of the tangent space generated by the application of theis group of isometries corresponds to a single null direction. Therefore at least two directions must coincide, and the spacetime is algebraically special.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top