Is sqrt(-1) x sqrt(-1) = -1 Algebraically Valid?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheAlkemist
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The mathematical argument that sqrt(-1) x sqrt(-1) = -1 is algebraically valid when using the principal square root, defined as i. However, there is a subtlety since both i and -i are square roots of -1. If different square roots are used in the multiplication, such as i and -i, the result changes to 1, highlighting the importance of consistent definitions. The discussion emphasizes that sqrt() must be treated as a function returning a single value, known as the principal value. Understanding these nuances is crucial for correctly applying complex numbers in algebra.
TheAlkemist
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
Question:

Is the following mathematical argument algebraically valid:

sqrt(-1) x sqrt(-1) = [sqrt(-1)]2 = -1

I know sqrt(-1) is a complex number, I just want to know if the argument above is valid.

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, it's valid.

There is one subtlety: there are two numbers whose square is -1, namely i and -i.

Your argument works fine if you choose sqrt(-1) = i:

\sqrt{-1} \times \sqrt{-1} = i \times i = i^2 = -1

and equally well if you choose sqrt(-1) = -i:

\sqrt{-1} \times \sqrt{-1} = (-i) \times (-i) = (-i)^2 = -1

But what happens if I choose sqrt(-1) = i for one of the square roots, and sqrt(-1) = -i for the other one? Then I get

\sqrt{-1} \times \sqrt{-1} = (i) \times (-i) = -(i^2) = 1

Uh oh!
 
jbunniii said:
Yes, it's valid.

There is one subtlety: there are two numbers whose square is -1, namely i and -i.

Your argument works fine if you choose sqrt(-1) = i:

\sqrt{-1} \times \sqrt{-1} = i \times i = i^2 = -1

and equally well if you choose sqrt(-1) = -i:

\sqrt{-1} \times \sqrt{-1} = (-i) \times (-i) = (-i)^2 = -1

But what happens if I choose sqrt(-1) = i for one of the square roots, and sqrt(-1) = -i for the other one? Then I get

\sqrt{-1} \times \sqrt{-1} = (i) \times (-i) = -(i^2) = 1

Uh oh!

LOL @ "uh oh!"

Thanks. I actually just searched through the threads and see that this question has been asked several times in different ways. But it make sense now. Thanks again.
 
That so I was told, is the reason for i. Then the matter becomes \sqrt(-1)x\sqrt(-1) = i^2 = -1.
 
Last edited:
The point is that you have to define sqrt() to be a function, i.e. return only one value. I think this is called principal value. Then your calculations works. You just have to remember that sqrt(x^2)\neq x in general.

But I'm not completely sure about this Riemann surface business and what it's for :)
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top