Is String Theory the Key to Unlocking the Universe's Mysteries?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chronos
  • Start date Start date
Chronos
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
11,420
Reaction score
751
Being as it is halloween, I am indulging in a question. String theory confuses me. I don't understand it, nor do I understand how it is superior to good old fashioned GR and QT, despite their current marital difficulties.

I have this recurring nightmare... [child] where did the universe come from? [me] the big bang. [child] where did the big bang come from? [me] strings. [child] where did strings come from? [me] branes. [child] where did branes come from? [me] it's past your bedtime.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hahahaha yeah that's pretty funny... But I personally favor the two colliding branes model of the formation of our Universe over the Big Bang model as it is less messy and needs less fine tuning. It also accounts for the patterns in the thermal radiation background. But I can completely sympathize with you on that nightmare of yours... In fact, I AM the child. = ) But then again, can you not ask why the same particle appears to be in two places at the same time as in that electron beam revision of Thomas Young's double slit experiment? I think that's more confusing to explain to a child than the origin of branes. After all, even the leading brains (el oh el) of quantum mechanics cannot give a better explanation then "accept nature as she is - chaotic" and tell us not to question further.
 


First of all, I completely understand your confusion about string theory. It is a complex and abstract concept that is still being explored and understood by scientists. However, I believe that the beauty of science is that it constantly challenges our understanding and pushes us to explore new ideas and theories.

One of the main reasons why string theory is considered superior to traditional theories like General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics is because it attempts to unify them into one comprehensive theory. GR and QT are both highly successful in their own domains, but they have fundamental differences that make it difficult to reconcile them. String theory, on the other hand, provides a framework that can potentially incorporate both theories and provide a more complete understanding of the universe.

As for the concept of branes, it is a crucial aspect of string theory that helps explain the origin of the universe. It suggests that our universe is just one of many parallel universes existing on different branes, or membranes. This idea may seem strange and even unsettling, but it is based on mathematical models and has gained support from various experiments and observations.

I understand your child's questions about the origins of the universe, and it is a question that scientists have been trying to answer for centuries. While we may not have a definitive answer yet, theories like string theory and branes offer a potential explanation that is supported by scientific evidence.

So, while string theory may seem like a complicated and mysterious concept, it is a valuable tool in our pursuit of understanding the universe. And who knows, perhaps one day we will have a better understanding of it and be able to answer your child's questions with more certainty. But for now, let's just enjoy the Halloween festivities and leave the mysteries of the universe for another day. Happy Halloween!
 
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
Many of us have heard of "twistors", arguably Roger Penrose's biggest contribution to theoretical physics. Twistor space is a space which maps nonlocally onto physical space-time; in particular, lightlike structures in space-time, like null lines and light cones, become much more "local" in twistor space. For various reasons, Penrose thought that twistor space was possibly a more fundamental arena for theoretical physics than space-time, and for many years he and a hardy band of mostly...
Back
Top