Is Structural Integrity related in any way to Static Friction? Or vice versa?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the relationship between structural integrity and static friction, questioning whether static friction plays a role in maintaining structural integrity and how it relates to the ability of materials to support loads without failure. The scope includes conceptual clarifications and technical reasoning related to structural engineering principles.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant defines structural integrity as an object's ability to resist required loads and questions the connection to static friction.
  • Another participant asks for clarification on the initial definition and the implications of collapse related to static friction.
  • A participant suggests considering whether friction contributes to the stability of structures.
  • One participant asserts that structural integrity involves the ability to resist loads, using the ground as an example, and questions the role of static friction.
  • Another participant argues that, theoretically, soil is treated as a homogeneous and elastic body, implying a limited role for static friction in structural integrity.
  • One contributor states that static friction at joints can enhance structural integrity, though not all joints rely on this mechanism.
  • A participant claims there is no universal relationship between a material's ultimate strength and the coefficient of static friction, indicating that ground strength is sufficient to prevent collapse regardless of friction.
  • Another participant notes that while friction is considered in structural design, particularly in foundation-soil interactions, it is not a primary design factor in most structural applications.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between static friction and structural integrity, with some suggesting a connection while others argue against it. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific engineering concepts and problems, such as the Boussinesq problem, and discuss the conditions under which friction is considered in structural design, indicating a nuanced understanding of the topic.

structural inte
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Structural integrity in my head means an object's uncompromised ability to safely resist required loads. Now is static friction related any way to it since the way to break structural integrity is to overcome the object's max load limit?

Also how can you walk across the floor without you or the floor collapsing relating static friction?

Thanks..
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to the forums!
Do you think that you could explain yourself better? For example, what does:
"uncompromised ability to safely resist required loads" mean?
And why would you or the floor collapse?
 
Do you mean if friction is taken in consideration in structures for stability?
 
Okay so structural integrity is the ability of an object to resist a certain load, i think. So for example the floor or the ground has a high structural integrity because it can handle a lot of weight on it. But is static friction involved in any way with it?
 
Well, the answer to your question (especially if by ground you mean soil) is no (well in theory). The soil is considered as a bounded infinite, homgogenous, isotropic, and linearly elastic body.

Look for Boussinesq problem.
 
I would say that in a way it is. Any structure that is joined together in any particular manner will have joints that rely on the frictional holding strength between them. Not every joint is held together in this way, but many are. So I would say that static friction between members of the structure enhances its integrity.
 
There isn't any unversal relationship that I know of between a material's ultimate strength, and coefficient of static friction between it and any other materials.

As for why the ground doesn't break under you, it because it is strong enough and you don't weigh very much anyway. Why the ground doesn't break has nothing to do with fricion.
 
Friction is usually taken into account in structural design for cases like sliding of retaining wall footings on soil. Friction is of course part of the reality that makes a structure work as well as lots of other things (if there were no friction, "slip critical bolts" would not work). But structural engineers usually do not design with friction, except for where there is foundation-soil interaction. I can't think of another case and I have designed many buildings.
 

Similar threads

I rewrote the Friction chapter from Tipler & Mosca
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Newtonian physics word problem static friction
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Graduate Kindly rectify my notion of sliding friction
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Maximizing Pulling Force with Static Friction
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Undergrad Confused on Static Friction - Walking and Driving
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
27K
Modeling Air Compression Cylinder
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
Undergrad Why Does Overcoming Static Friction Lead to a Decrease in Force?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Confused - How do I find the static and kinetic friction coefficient?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
Undergrad How is force applied? Is resistance or load necessary for force to exist?
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Just need to clarify something (FRICTION)
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K