Is that subset of the set of continuous differential functions closed?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of a specific subspace of continuous differential functions, denoted as W, within the context of the inner product space C^1_{[0,1]}. The original poster seeks to demonstrate that W, defined as the set of functions f in C^1_{[0,1]} such that f(1)=0, is a closed subspace.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of W being a closed subspace and discuss the necessary conditions for convergence within the space. There is a focus on the behavior of Cauchy sequences and the continuity of the limit function. Questions arise regarding the completeness of the space and the requirements for proving that the limit function also belongs to W.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights and clarifications regarding the proof structure. Some guidance has been offered on the necessity of showing that the limit function meets the criteria of W, while others have raised questions about the completeness of the space and the implications of convergence.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of the inner product definition and its implications for the properties of the space. There is a recognition of the need to verify assumptions about the completeness of C^1_{[0,1]} and the implications for the proof of closure.

approx1mate
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi! I have used the physics forum a lot of times to deal with several tasks that I had and now its the time to introduce my own query! So please bear with me :-)

Homework Statement


Equip the set [itex]C^1_{[0,1]}[/itex] with the inner product:
[tex] \left\langle f,g \right\rangle= \int_{0}^{1} f(x)\bar{g(x)} + \int_{0}^{1} f'(x)\bar{g'(x)}dx[/tex]
(the bar above the [itex]g[/itex] function is the conjugate symbol)
I need to show that the subspace:

[tex] W = \{f\in C^1_{[0,1]} | f(1)=0\}[/tex]

is a closed subspace of [itex]C^1_{[0,1]}[/itex].

Homework Equations



[itex]\left\langle f,cosh \right\rangle = f(1)sinh(1)[/itex].

The Cauchy inequality: [itex]|\left\langle f,g \right\rangle | \le \|f\|\|g\|[/itex],
the Pythagoras theorem: [itex]\|f+g\|^2 = \|f\|^2 + \|g\|^2[/itex],
the parallelogram law: [itex]\|f+g\|^2 + \|f-g\|^2 = 2(\|f\|^2 + \|g\|^2)[/itex],
the triangular inequality: [itex]\|f+g\| \le \|f\| + \|g\|[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Let us take a Cauchy sequence [itex]\{f^n\}_{n=1}^{\infty} \in W[/itex], because
[itex](C^1_{[0,1]},\|\cdot \|)[/itex] is a Hilbert space then the sequence [itex]\{f^n\}_{n=1}^{\infty}[/itex] converges to [itex]f\in C^1_{[0,1]}[/itex].
Therefore it only remains to be shown that at the limit [itex]f(1)=0[/itex].

At this point I am stuck. I can see that the [itex]cosh[/itex] function is orthogonal
to the set [itex]W[/itex] and I also tried to use the above "relevant equations" but
I couldn't see what would be a possible proof.

Any advice?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
approx1mate said:
Hi! I have used the physics forum a lot of times to deal with several tasks that I had and now its the time to introduce my own query! So please bear with me :-)

Homework Statement


Equip the set [itex]C^1_{[0,1]}[/itex] with the inner product:
[tex] \left\langle f,g \right\rangle= \int_{0}^{1} f(x)\bar{g(x)} + \int_{0}^{1} f'(x)\bar{g'(x)}dx[/tex]
(the bar above the [itex]g[/itex] function is the conjugate symbol)
I need to show that the subspace:

[tex] W = \{f\in C^1_{[0,1]} | f(1)=0\}[/tex]

is a closed subspace of [itex]C^1_{[0,1]}[/itex].

Homework Equations



[itex]\left\langle f,cosh \right\rangle = f(1)sinh(1)[/itex].

The Cauchy inequality: [itex]|\left\langle f,g \right\rangle | \le \|f\|\|g\|[/itex],
the Pythagoras theorem: [itex]\|f+g\|^2 = \|f\|^2 + \|g\|^2[/itex],
the parallelogram law: [itex]\|f+g\|^2 + \|f-g\|^2 = 2(\|f\|^2 + \|g\|^2)[/itex],
the triangular inequality: [itex]\|f+g\| \le \|f\| + \|g\|[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Let us take a Cauchy sequence [itex]\{f^n\}_{n=1}^{\infty} \in W[/itex], because
[itex](C^1_{[0,1]},\|\cdot \|)[/itex] is a Hilbert space then the sequence [itex]\{f^n\}_{n=1}^{\infty}[/itex] converges to [itex]f\in C^1_{[0,1]}[/itex].
Therefore it only remains to be shown that at the limit [itex]f(1)=0[/itex].

At this point I am stuck. I can see that the [itex]cosh[/itex] function is orthogonal
to the set [itex]W[/itex] and I also tried to use the above "relevant equations" but
I couldn't see what would be a possible proof.

Any advice?

First of all, I very much doubt that your space is a Hilbert space. It has an inner-product, but are you sure it is complete. Did you prove it??

Anyway, you don't really need it for the proof. For the proof you must take a convergent sequence [itex](f_n)_n[/itex] in W. So you know that [itex]f_n(1)=0[/itex] for all n. You must prove that the limit f also has f(1)=0.

You must not prove that [itex](f_n)_n[/itex] is Cauchy and you must not prove that it converges. You know convergence from the hypothesis.
 
micromass said:
First of all, I very much doubt that your space is a Hilbert space. It has an inner-product, but are you sure it is complete. Did you prove it??
You are right, I was wrong about that.

micromass said:
Anyway, you don't really need it for the proof. For the proof you must take a convergent sequence [itex](f_n)_n[/itex] in W. So you know that [itex]f_n(1)=0[/itex] for all n. You must prove that the limit f also has f(1)=0.

Ok, that was my thought from the very beginning. But if I need just the [itex]f(1)=0[/itex], then how do I know that the limit [itex]f[/itex] is also a continuous differentiable function? Don't I need that as well?
 
approx1mate said:
You are right, I was wrong about that.



Ok, that was my thought from the very beginning. But if I need just the [itex]f_n(1)=0[/itex], then how do I know that the limit [itex]f[/itex] is also a continuous differentiable function? Don't I need that as well?

No, you have that.

So what you have is that a sequence [itex](f_n)_n[/itex] in W converges to a function [itex]f\in C^1_{[0,1]}[/itex]. You must show f to be in W.
 
micromass said:
No, you have that.

So what you have is that a sequence [itex](f_n)_n[/itex] in W converges to a function [itex]f\in C^1_{[0,1]}[/itex]. You must show f to be in W.

Oh yes, I am sorry, all that time I didn't pay any attention to the definition of W.
Thanks
 
I think that the solution is:

[itex]|\left\langle f^n-f,cosh \right\rangle| \le \|f^n-f\|\|cosh\|[/itex]

But [itex]\forall \epsilon \ \ \exists n_o(\epsilon)[/itex] such that for any
[itex]n \ge n_0(\epsilon)[/itex] we have that:

[itex]|\left\langle f^n-f,cosh \right\rangle| \le \epsilon \|cosh\|[/itex]

Therefore [itex]\left\langle f^n-f,cosh \right\rangle \to 0 \Leftrightarrow[/itex] [itex]\left\langle f^n,cosh \right\rangle - \left\langle f,cosh \right\rangle \to 0 \Leftrightarrow[/itex]

[itex]f(1)sinh(1) \to 0 \Leftrightarrow f(1)\to 0[/itex]
 
Last edited:
Looks ok. However in the last line, you don't want =0 but rather [itex]\rightarrow 0[/itex].

So you got

[tex]<f^n-f,cosh>\rightarrow 0[/tex]

for example.
 
micromass said:
Looks ok. However in the last line, you don't want =0 but rather [itex]\rightarrow 0[/itex].

So you got

[tex]<f^n-f,cosh>\rightarrow 0[/tex]

for example.

Yes you are right again, thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K