MHB Is the 3-D Rotation Matrix Defined by Euler Rotations or a General Angle?

ognik
Messages
626
Reaction score
2
The question mentions an orthogonal matrix describing a rotation in 3D ... where $\phi$ is the net angle of rotation about a fixed single axis. I know of the 3 Euler rotations, is this one of them, arbitrary, or is there a general 3-D rotation matrix in one angle?

If I build one, I would start with the direction cosines $ \begin{bmatrix}cos(x', x)&cos(y', x)&cos(z', x)\\cos(x', y)&cos(y', y)...\\...\end{bmatrix}$

Lets say we rotate a total of $\phi$, I think this means $\phi = \phi_x + \phi_y + \phi_z$? But around the z axis only (for example), $\phi = \phi_z$?

So I'm not sure how to apply this to the matrix above, is everything except w.r.t. z = $\delta_{ij}$?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Would appreciate corrections/confirmations to the above please - and if I put something confusingly I'll be happy to improve it, if I know what it is :-)
 
I'm now sure the question could use any of the 3 Eular (orthogonal) rotation matrices, the diagonals of each have 2 $Cos \phi$ terms and a 1. i.e. the sum of the 3 eigenvalues is $2Cos \phi + 1$

The question now is - given 1 eigenvalue = 1, show the other 2 = $e^{\pm i\phi}$

Choosing the rotation about the z axis, $R_z = \begin{bmatrix}Cos&-Sin&0\\Sin&Cos&0\\0&0&1\end{bmatrix}$

My Characteristic eqtn is $ (1-\lambda)(Cos^2\phi -2\lambda Cos\phi + Sin^2 \phi) $ = $ (1-\lambda)(1-2\lambda Cos\phi) $

The simplest (to me anyway) roots are $\lambda = 1$ (as expected) and $ \lambda = \frac{1}{2 Cos\phi}$ (But 2 complex roots expected?)

Now I could say that $ Cos\phi =Re\left\{ \frac{e^{i \phi}+e^{-i \phi}} {2} \right\} $ and dredge $\lambda = e^{\pm i\phi}$ out of this - but the question states that these 2 should be complex eigenvalues and I have to take the real parts to make this work?
 
Just revisiting this and noticed a silly mistake, off course $ Cos \phi = \frac{1}{2} \left( e^{i \phi} + e^{-i \phi} \right)$. Also my characteristic eqtn was wrong (Doh) ,

$ (1-\lambda)(Cos^2\phi -2\lambda Cos\phi + \lambda^2 + Sin^2 \phi) $ = $ (1 -\lambda)(\lambda^2-2\lambda Cos\phi +1) $ ... which indeed provides 2 complex roots - $e^{i \phi}, e^{-i \phi} $ - in addition to $\lambda = 1$
 
Last edited:
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top