MHB Is the 3-D Rotation Matrix Defined by Euler Rotations or a General Angle?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the definition of a 3-D rotation matrix, specifically in relation to Euler rotations and general angles. The participant explores the construction of an orthogonal matrix for rotation, emphasizing the role of direction cosines and the relationship between total rotation angle $\phi$ and its components $\phi_x$, $\phi_y$, and $\phi_z$. The conversation also delves into eigenvalues of the rotation matrix, confirming that for a rotation about the z-axis, the eigenvalues are 1, $e^{i\phi}$, and $e^{-i\phi}$, derived from the corrected characteristic equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 3D rotation matrices
  • Familiarity with Euler angles and their application in rotations
  • Knowledge of eigenvalues and eigenvectors in linear algebra
  • Proficiency in trigonometric functions, particularly cosine and sine
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of 3D rotation matrices using Euler angles
  • Learn about the properties of orthogonal matrices in linear transformations
  • Explore the significance of eigenvalues in the context of rotation matrices
  • Investigate the relationship between complex numbers and trigonometric functions in rotations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, computer graphics developers, and anyone involved in 3D modeling or simulations requiring an understanding of rotation matrices and their properties.

ognik
Messages
626
Reaction score
2
The question mentions an orthogonal matrix describing a rotation in 3D ... where $\phi$ is the net angle of rotation about a fixed single axis. I know of the 3 Euler rotations, is this one of them, arbitrary, or is there a general 3-D rotation matrix in one angle?

If I build one, I would start with the direction cosines $ \begin{bmatrix}cos(x', x)&cos(y', x)&cos(z', x)\\cos(x', y)&cos(y', y)...\\...\end{bmatrix}$

Lets say we rotate a total of $\phi$, I think this means $\phi = \phi_x + \phi_y + \phi_z$? But around the z axis only (for example), $\phi = \phi_z$?

So I'm not sure how to apply this to the matrix above, is everything except w.r.t. z = $\delta_{ij}$?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Would appreciate corrections/confirmations to the above please - and if I put something confusingly I'll be happy to improve it, if I know what it is :-)
 
I'm now sure the question could use any of the 3 Euler (orthogonal) rotation matrices, the diagonals of each have 2 $Cos \phi$ terms and a 1. i.e. the sum of the 3 eigenvalues is $2Cos \phi + 1$

The question now is - given 1 eigenvalue = 1, show the other 2 = $e^{\pm i\phi}$

Choosing the rotation about the z axis, $R_z = \begin{bmatrix}Cos&-Sin&0\\Sin&Cos&0\\0&0&1\end{bmatrix}$

My Characteristic eqtn is $ (1-\lambda)(Cos^2\phi -2\lambda Cos\phi + Sin^2 \phi) $ = $ (1-\lambda)(1-2\lambda Cos\phi) $

The simplest (to me anyway) roots are $\lambda = 1$ (as expected) and $ \lambda = \frac{1}{2 Cos\phi}$ (But 2 complex roots expected?)

Now I could say that $ Cos\phi =Re\left\{ \frac{e^{i \phi}+e^{-i \phi}} {2} \right\} $ and dredge $\lambda = e^{\pm i\phi}$ out of this - but the question states that these 2 should be complex eigenvalues and I have to take the real parts to make this work?
 
Just revisiting this and noticed a silly mistake, off course $ Cos \phi = \frac{1}{2} \left( e^{i \phi} + e^{-i \phi} \right)$. Also my characteristic eqtn was wrong (Doh) ,

$ (1-\lambda)(Cos^2\phi -2\lambda Cos\phi + \lambda^2 + Sin^2 \phi) $ = $ (1 -\lambda)(\lambda^2-2\lambda Cos\phi +1) $ ... which indeed provides 2 complex roots - $e^{i \phi}, e^{-i \phi} $ - in addition to $\lambda = 1$
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
900
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
997
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
3K