Is the 3-D Rotation Matrix Defined by Euler Rotations or a General Angle?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the definition and application of the 3-D rotation matrix, specifically whether it is defined by Euler rotations or a general angle. Participants explore the mathematical formulation of rotation matrices and their eigenvalues, delving into the implications of using different rotation axes and angles.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if the rotation matrix can be defined by a single angle or if it must involve the three Euler rotations, suggesting that the net angle of rotation could be a sum of rotations about the x, y, and z axes.
  • Another participant expresses uncertainty about how to apply the rotation matrix and whether components not related to the z-axis should be set to the identity matrix.
  • A later post proposes that the rotation matrix can utilize any of the three Euler rotation matrices and discusses the eigenvalues of the rotation matrix, noting that the sum of the eigenvalues is related to the cosine of the rotation angle.
  • One participant derives the characteristic equation for the rotation matrix about the z-axis and identifies one eigenvalue as 1, questioning how to show the other two eigenvalues are complex.
  • A subsequent post corrects earlier mistakes in the characteristic equation and confirms that the correct formulation yields two complex roots, $e^{i \phi}$ and $e^{-i \phi}$, alongside the eigenvalue of 1.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definition of the rotation matrix and the implications of using Euler angles versus a general angle. There is no consensus on the best approach or the correct interpretation of the eigenvalues.

Contextual Notes

Some participants acknowledge potential errors in their calculations and reasoning, indicating that the discussion may be influenced by misunderstandings or misapplications of mathematical principles.

ognik
Messages
626
Reaction score
2
The question mentions an orthogonal matrix describing a rotation in 3D ... where $\phi$ is the net angle of rotation about a fixed single axis. I know of the 3 Euler rotations, is this one of them, arbitrary, or is there a general 3-D rotation matrix in one angle?

If I build one, I would start with the direction cosines $ \begin{bmatrix}cos(x', x)&cos(y', x)&cos(z', x)\\cos(x', y)&cos(y', y)...\\...\end{bmatrix}$

Lets say we rotate a total of $\phi$, I think this means $\phi = \phi_x + \phi_y + \phi_z$? But around the z axis only (for example), $\phi = \phi_z$?

So I'm not sure how to apply this to the matrix above, is everything except w.r.t. z = $\delta_{ij}$?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Would appreciate corrections/confirmations to the above please - and if I put something confusingly I'll be happy to improve it, if I know what it is :-)
 
I'm now sure the question could use any of the 3 Euler (orthogonal) rotation matrices, the diagonals of each have 2 $Cos \phi$ terms and a 1. i.e. the sum of the 3 eigenvalues is $2Cos \phi + 1$

The question now is - given 1 eigenvalue = 1, show the other 2 = $e^{\pm i\phi}$

Choosing the rotation about the z axis, $R_z = \begin{bmatrix}Cos&-Sin&0\\Sin&Cos&0\\0&0&1\end{bmatrix}$

My Characteristic eqtn is $ (1-\lambda)(Cos^2\phi -2\lambda Cos\phi + Sin^2 \phi) $ = $ (1-\lambda)(1-2\lambda Cos\phi) $

The simplest (to me anyway) roots are $\lambda = 1$ (as expected) and $ \lambda = \frac{1}{2 Cos\phi}$ (But 2 complex roots expected?)

Now I could say that $ Cos\phi =Re\left\{ \frac{e^{i \phi}+e^{-i \phi}} {2} \right\} $ and dredge $\lambda = e^{\pm i\phi}$ out of this - but the question states that these 2 should be complex eigenvalues and I have to take the real parts to make this work?
 
Just revisiting this and noticed a silly mistake, off course $ Cos \phi = \frac{1}{2} \left( e^{i \phi} + e^{-i \phi} \right)$. Also my characteristic eqtn was wrong (Doh) ,

$ (1-\lambda)(Cos^2\phi -2\lambda Cos\phi + \lambda^2 + Sin^2 \phi) $ = $ (1 -\lambda)(\lambda^2-2\lambda Cos\phi +1) $ ... which indeed provides 2 complex roots - $e^{i \phi}, e^{-i \phi} $ - in addition to $\lambda = 1$
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
3K