News Is the Age of Scientific Censure Imminent?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gleem
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Age Scientific
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the implications of the Trump administration's transition team questioning employees at the Department of Energy regarding their involvement in climate-related research. Concerns are raised about the administration's intent to suppress climate science and marginalize advocates for sustainability, reflecting a broader trend of politicization in energy policy. Participants emphasize that while the questions posed may be reasonable, the context suggests a potential agenda to undermine established climate findings. The conversation also touches on the future of energy research, particularly in nuclear power, and the challenges faced by scientists in a politically charged environment. Ultimately, the discourse highlights the tension between political power and scientific integrity in addressing climate change.
  • #31
From yesterday's Washington Post:

Scientists are frantically copying U.S. climate data, fearing it might vanish under Trump

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...under-trump/?tid=a_inl&utm_term=.1c6889832524

Alarmed that decades of crucial climate measurements could vanish under a hostile Trump administration, scientists have begun a feverish attempt to copy reams of government data onto independent servers in hopes of safeguarding it from any political interference.

The efforts include a “https://ischool.utoronto.ca/content/guerrilla-archiving-event-saving-environmental-data-trump ” event in Toronto, where experts will copy irreplaceable public data, meetings at the University of Pennsylvania focused on how to download as much federal data as possible in the coming weeks, and a collaboration of scientists and database experts who are compiling an online site to harbor scientific information...

But today's surprise development is:

Donald Trump's transition team is backing away from a controversial questionnaire sent to the Department of Energy demanding names of employees who assisted in the Obama administration's climate policy efforts.

ABC News obtained last week the 74-point memo, which asks for names of staff members who worked on climate-related projects.

The Department of Energy hit back on Tuesday with a statement saying that the memo "left many in our workforce unsettled" and that it would not comply with questions asking for names of individuals.

DOE officials "respect the professional and scientific integrity and independence of our employees at our labs and across our department," agency spokesman Eben Burnham-Snyder said in a statement.

The Trump transition team has repeatedly declined to respond to ABC News' requests for comment, but in a statement to ABC News today, an official said, "The questionnaire was not authorized or part of our standard protocol. The person who sent it has been properly counseled." ...

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trum...tionnaire-energy-department/story?id=44190652

Which leaves me extremely curious about the identity of the transition team member who went rogue and issued an unauthorized questionnaire to the DOE.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
"experts will copy irreplaceable public data, "
Oxymoron.
 
  • Like
Likes mheslep and russ_watters
  • #33
Bystander said:
"experts will copy irreplaceable public data, "
Oxymoron.

How so? I think you way over state.
These are big database sets, but just a couple of books someone might have laying around.
Maybe you have no respect for the data.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K