Is the Answer Sheet Wrong? A Closer Look at Velocity-Time Graphs

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eobardrush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the accuracy of a textbook answer regarding the total distance traveled as represented by a velocity-time graph. The user calculated the distance using the trapezium area method, arriving at a total of 626 meters. They questioned the presence of a value of 15 in the textbook's answer for the second trapezium, suggesting it may be an error. Other participants confirmed the user's suspicion, highlighting the importance of critical thinking in scientific inquiry.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of velocity-time graphs
  • Knowledge of trapezium area calculations
  • Familiarity with basic physics concepts related to motion
  • Ability to critically analyze textbook content
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of calculating areas under curves in physics
  • Study the application of trapezoidal rule in motion analysis
  • Explore common errors in physics textbooks and how to identify them
  • Learn about the significance of critical thinking in scientific problem-solving
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators reviewing textbook accuracy, and anyone interested in understanding motion analysis through graphical representation.

Eobardrush
Messages
18
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Find the total distance travelled in the first 16 seconds
Relevant Equations
s=0.5(a+b)*h
So I am supposed to look at the graph at part C and determine the total distance travelled. This is the answer sheet of the textbook. But I feel like the textbook is wrong here. But then I needed a confirmation if others can agree that it is wrong or not cause now I am very confused.

My answer is as follows

I divided this into two trapeziums.
1st Trapezium from the left:

s=0.5(15+55)*10

2nd Trapezium next to it:

s=0.5(55+37)*6

And then I add both of these trapezium area for the total distance.

So my answer is= 626m

The problem is that I am not sure why there is a 15 in the answer sheet for the 2nd Trapezium(for the variable "a" in the trapezium area equation). I think it is wrong. But maybe am I missing something?

Note v is given in ms^-1
t is given in seconds
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    40.6 KB · Views: 135
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Obvious typo/slip on the solver’s part.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Eobardrush
Orodruin said:
Obvious typo/slip on the solver’s part.
Ah thank god. Thanks for confirming for me. Else I would have been spending the whole day trying to figure out why there is a 15 there haha.
This is the first time seeing a mistake in this textbook. But I guess things like this happen
 
Eobardrush said:
This is the first time seeing a mistake in this textbook. But I guess things like this happen
They do happen and it's a good idea to bear that in mind. What drew me to science is that when you're right, you're right and it's not contingent on someone else's opinion.
 
kuruman said:
when you're right, you're right and it's not contingent on someone else's opinion.
Is that an opinion I see? 🤣
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kuruman
Orodruin said:
Is that an opinion I see?
"Not just ANY opinion, K-man's opinion."
 
Orodruin said:
Is that an opinion I see? 🤣
Bystander said:
"Not just ANY opinion, K-man's opinion."
You're both right! :oldsmile:
 
kuruman said:
You're both right! :oldsmile:
That’s what I love about science, there’s no one right answer.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K