Is the damage from a collision affected by the speed of the vehicles involved?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the impact of vehicle speed on collision damage, specifically comparing scenarios where one vehicle is stationary and another is in motion at different speeds. Participants explore various factors influencing the severity of damage in collisions, including momentum, engine torque, and the nature of the collision itself.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant argues that a collision involving a vehicle traveling at 60mph into a stationary vehicle would result in more damage than a collision between two vehicles traveling at 50mph and 60mph, citing the force exerted by the engine and wind resistance.
  • Another participant questions whether the type of collision (e.g., head-on vs. rear-end) affects the outcome.
  • A participant notes that the torque multiplier is higher at lower speeds, suggesting that the momentum effect of the engine may be greater at lower speeds than at higher speeds.
  • There is a discussion about the flywheel's momentum and its effect on engine torque, with some suggesting that it would be greater at higher speeds.
  • One participant highlights the conservation of momentum, arguing that a heavier vehicle like a cement mixer would cause more damage to a lighter vehicle like a hatchback due to its mass.
  • Another participant points out that more energy is required to decelerate a vehicle traveling at higher speeds, but also raises the idea of considering the inertial frame of reference of the cement mixer.
  • There is a discussion about the work done to slow down a vehicle in different frames of reference, suggesting that the relative motion to a stationary object (like the cement mixer) may yield similar energy requirements for deceleration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on how speed affects collision damage, with no consensus reached. Some argue for the significance of speed and momentum, while others emphasize the role of vehicle mass and collision dynamics.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions regarding vehicle dynamics, torque, and the nature of collisions, but these assumptions remain unresolved and depend on specific conditions not fully explored in the discussion.

Matteh
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi, new user here, just had to ask this question though to settle a debate! :)

What I'm saying is that for a collision between two vehicles with one stationary and the other traveling at 10mph the damage will be less than if one vehicle was traveling at 50mph and the other at 60mph - same 10mph difference.

My main belief for this is that at 60mph, the engine is driving the car forwards with more force w.r.t speed as it has to overcome wind resistance. If the two vehicles were to collide, the engine would keep pushing the vehicle forwards, into the other creating a 'bigger' crash. if it were at 10mph, the engine would be doing less work compared to the speed and as such would slow down easier.

In this case, a hatchback (at 60mph) went into a cement mixer (at 50mph) and the damage looks more than the claimed 10mph difference

Any thoughts on this? my view obviously seems logical to me, but everyone else dissagrees!

its odd, because you have to take into account the fact that the car is propelled and the drag forces associated with the system
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess it depends on the collision - is it a head on collision?
 
oh sorry, the car (travelling at 60mph) went into the back of the cement mixer (travelling at 50mph)
 
At lower speed and in a lower gear, the torque multiplier is much higher than in a higher gear (probably overdrive) cruising at 60mph. The momentum effect of the engine will also be multiplied by the gearing. So the effect of the engine's momentum may be higher at the lower speed than at the higher speed.
 
You could also say that the flywheel would have more momentum as it would be turning much faster, this would increase the engines torque
 
Cement mixer and hatchback vs... two sedans? Because the cement mixer is obviously (in terms of conservation of momentum) going to force the hatchback to slow down more, meaning it's going to take more damage

Ignoring that, more energy is required to slow down the 60 mph car to, say, 55, than for a 10 mph car to slow down to say, 5 mph (because it's v2)
 
Office_Shredder said:
Cement mixer and hatchback vs... two sedans? Because the cement mixer is obviously (in terms of conservation of momentum) going to force the hatchback to slow down more, meaning it's going to take more damage

Ignoring that, more energy is required to slow down the 60 mph car to, say, 55, than for a 10 mph car to slow down to say, 5 mph (because it's v2)

but what about if you think of it with the cement truck as the inertial frame of reference? the car is then only doing 10mph
 
Matteh said:
flywheel would have more momentum as it would be turning much faster, this would increase the engines torque
Assume that top gear is 3 times as tall as 1st gear (typical, 1st gear at around 3.00, top gear at 1.00) Then the flywheel is turning twice as fast at 60mph in top gear than at 10mph in 1st gear, but in 1st gear, the torque is multiplied by 3, so there's more momentum effect in 1st gear at 10mph.

More energy is required to slow down the car from 60 mph car to 50, than from 10mph to 0.
True if the tires were doing the slowing, but in this case it's the big truck. The energy's frame of reference should be the relative to the point of application, and in both of these situations, the point of application is the big truck, so the energy relative to the truck is the same.

Say the car was going 10mph forwards on a flat bed truck moving at 50mph. The amount of work it takes to slow from 10mph to 0 on the truck is the same as if the car were slowing from 10mph to 0 on pavement, even though the car slows from 60mph to 50mph relative to the pavement when it's on the flat bed truck.

Similarly, even though the Earth surface is moving at 900mph to the East at specific latitudes, the work done to slow from 10mph to 0mph is virtually the same if the car is headed east or west. Not to mention that the Earth is orbiting the Sun at around 67,000mph, and the Sun orbits the Milky Way at around 560,000mph.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
12K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
17K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
84K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K