I Is the Delta Function a Scalar?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter kent davidge
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scalar
kent davidge
Messages
931
Reaction score
56
I read that ##\delta^4(x-y)## is invariant under Lorentz transformations. I was trying to show myself this, so I procceded as follows.

The following integrals are both equal to 1 ##\int \delta^4(x-y) d^4 x## and ##\int \delta^4 (x'-y') d^4x'## so I assume they are equal to one another, as long as we integrate them over all ##\mathbb R^4##. Now ##d^4 x = d^4 x'## because the Lorentz metric has ##\sqrt {| \eta |} = 1##. So I conclude that ## \delta^4(x-y) = \delta^4(x'-y') ##. Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pretty much correct.

A more detailed explanation follows. The delta function is what Lovelock and Run called a relative tensor. In essence the delta function must transform so that ##\int \delta^{(4)}\left(x\right) d^4 x## does not depend on coordinates. However, the "volume" form ##d^4 x## does depend on coordinates. If we switch coordinates using a map ##\phi: x\to\bar{x}##, then ##\int_V \dots d^4 x = \int_\bar{V} \dots \frac{\partial\left(x\right)}{\partial \left(\bar{x}\right)} d^4 \bar{x}##, where ## \frac{\partial\left(x\right)}{\partial \left(\bar{x}\right)}## is the Jacobian.

It follows that:

## \frac{\partial\left(x\right)}{\partial \left(\bar{x}\right)} \delta^{(4)}\left(x(\bar{x})\right) = \delta^{(4)}\left(\bar{x}\right)##

to counteract the scaling of the volume element. With some work (Lovelock & Rund, "Tensors, Differential forms ...", Chap 4) you can show that ##\frac{\partial\left(\bar{x}\right)}{\partial \left(x\right)}=\sqrt{\frac{g}{\bar{g}}}##, where ##g## is the determinant of the metric in the initial coordinate system.

Finally, you can conclude that whilst delta function is not a scalar, the following quantity:

##\frac{1}{\sqrt{g}} \delta^{(4)}\left(x\right) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\bar{g}}} \delta^{(4)}\left(\bar{x}\right)##

is. It does not come into play for basic Lorentzian boosts, because, as you noted ##\sqrt{g}=1## at all times.
 
  • Love
Likes kent davidge
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top