Is the Derivation of the Relationship Between CDF and PDF Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RRraskolnikov
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between cumulative distribution functions (CDF) and probability density functions (PDF) in the context of random variables. It presents equations showing that the expected value of a function of a random variable can be expressed in two different forms, leading to the conclusion that the PDFs of the original variable and the transformed variable are related. The key assertion is that the CDF of one variable can be expressed as the CDF of another variable plus a constant. Participants are encouraged to explore specific functions to test this relationship further. The conversation emphasizes the mathematical derivation and implications of these relationships in probability theory.
RRraskolnikov
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
No, this is not for a homework. Please don't delete the thread.

CDF(Z) = Prob(Z < z)
CDF(Y) = Prob(Y < y) where y = f(z)
PDF(Z) = \frac{d(CDF(Z))}{dz}
PDF(Y) = \frac{d(CDF(Y))}{df(z)}

Now, it is known from various internet sources and wikipedia that:
E(f(z))= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{f(z) PDF(z) }dz - (1)

Also, since z is a random variable, f(z) is also a random variable, hence:
E(f(z))= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{f(z) PDF(f(z)) }df(z) - (2)

From (1) and (2),
PDF(z)dz = PDF(f(z)) df(z)

From this doesn't it follow that:

CDF(z) = CDF(f(z)) + const.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
OK - check by seeing if you can find some function f(z) where the CDF of f(z) differs from CDF of z by something other than a constant.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top