Is the Discrete Fourier Transform a Unitary Transformation?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) and whether it qualifies as a unitary transformation. Participants are examining the mathematical formulation of the DFT and its representation in matrix form.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to prove the unitarity of the DFT by constructing its matrix form and analyzing the product of the matrix and its complex conjugate. Some participants question the necessity of including the normalization factor and the correct definition of the inverse in relation to unitary matrices.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the mathematical details, with some providing guidance on the importance of the normalization factor and the distinction between the complex conjugate and the adjoint. There is an exploration of how to achieve the identity matrix through the appropriate calculations.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted omission of the normalization factor in the matrix representation, which is critical for proving unitarity. The discussion also highlights confusion regarding the definitions and properties of unitary matrices.

Emperor42
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to prove that the discrete form of the Fourier transform is a unitary transformation

So I used the equation for the discrete Fourier transform:
##y_k=\frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}\sum^{N-1}_{j=0}{x_je^{i2\pi\frac{jk}{N}}}##

and I put the Fourier transform into a N-1 by N-1 matrix form:
##U=\begin{pmatrix}
e^0 & e^0 & e^0 & ...\\
e^0 & e^{\frac{i2\pi}{N}} & e^{\frac{i4\pi}{N}} & ...\\
e^0 & e^{\frac{i4\pi}{N}} & e^{\frac{i8\pi}{N}} & ...\\
... & ... & ... & ...\\
\end{pmatrix}##

and then found the complex conjugate:
##U^*=\begin{pmatrix}
e^0 & e^0 & e^0 & ...\\
e^0 & e^{-\frac{i2\pi}{N}} & e^{-\frac{i4\pi}{N}} & ...\\
e^0 & e^{-\frac{i4\pi}{N}} & e^{-\frac{i8\pi}{N}} & ...\\
... & ... & ... & ...\\
\end{pmatrix}##

But if I multiply these matrices together I get nothing which even approaches the identity matrix. Anyone have any ideas? Is there something wrong with the matrix?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You omitted the factor of ##1/\sqrt{N}##. Without it, the matrix won't be unitary. Also, the inverse of a unitary matrix is its adjoint, not the complex conjugate.
 
I understand that I haven't put in the ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}##. But why do I need the inverse? I'm trying to calculate whether the matrix is unitary so I need to find the inner product of the matrix and its complex conjugate, wouldn't I?
 
Last edited:
Ok I think I can get the diagonal elements to go to if I add the ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}## factor but I still don't understand how the off diagonal elements go to zero.
 
Emperor42 said:
I understand that I haven't put in the ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}##. But why do I need the inverse? I'm trying to calculate whether the matrix is unitary so I need to find the inner product of the matrix and its complex conjugate, wouldn't I?
No. Unitary means that the inverse of the matrix is its adjoint. In other words, if you multiply a unitary matrix by its adjoint (not conjugate), you get the identity matrix, which is what you're trying to show.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K