Is the Electron a Wave Medium?

AI Thread Summary
Electrons are described as a wave medium through which energy propagates, challenging the notion that they carry energy around a circuit. They move through metal at very slow speeds, around a few millimeters per second, while the energy transfer occurs almost instantaneously when a switch is flicked. The analogy of a bicycle chain illustrates how a shock wave travels quickly through the links, establishing tension without significant movement of the links themselves. This phenomenon is attributed to the repulsive forces between adjacent electrons, which allows a wave to travel at speeds close to, but not equal to, the speed of light. The term "drift velocity" is relevant in this context, emphasizing that while electrons do circulate in the circuit, their slow movement is not critical to energy transfer.
bejoynp
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
In this following link:

http://amasci.com/miscon/eleca.html#electron

the author has mentioned that electrons are a wave medium through which energy can propagate. Is it true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is a good way of looking at it. It is definitely wrong to say that the electrons 'go round the circuit' carrying energy with them. For a start, they actually move through a metal at only a few mm per second and the light goes on as soon as you flick the switch.

I like to visualise what happens in a conductor as what happens in a bicycle chain. When you stamp on the pedal, a shock wave travels through the links, the tension is established and, very soon afterwards, the wheel starts to move. The links have only moved a miniscule amount, though. This is what happens with the electrons. A wave passes along, due to the repulsive forces between adjacent electrons (due to the electric fields). This travels very quickly - but not quite as fast as the speed of light.
 
They actually do 'go round the circuit'. I think the term is called 'drift flow' or something (now I'm curious. what exactly is the term?), but that's not important to the circuit, so yes, considering them the medium of a wave in the circuit is a good way of looking at it.
 
Galap said:
They actually do 'go round the circuit'. I think the term is called 'drift flow' or something (now I'm curious. what exactly is the term?), but that's not important to the circuit, so yes, considering them the medium of a wave in the circuit is a good way of looking at it.

That's what I wrote. But they go verrrrry slowly and that is hardly relevant to the carrying of the energy. A Bicycle chain also 'goes round' but the energy gets from foot to wheel much quicker.
The term you want is 'drift velocity', I think. This velocity is much less than the mean square velocity, due to thermal motion, though.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top