Is the energy inside an electron-orbital vibrational energy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter desta41
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies that the energy within an electron orbital is not classified as vibrational energy but rather as kinetic and potential energy described by quantum mechanics. While there is a frequency associated with orbitals, it relates to the Schrödinger equation and does not imply classical vibrations. The concept of quantum vibrations applies to molecular systems rather than atomic orbitals. Observations in quantum mechanics typically reflect mean values of operators, indicating that the most probable position of an electron remains constant in stationary states. Thus, vibrational energy is not a characteristic of atomic orbitals.
desta41
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Is the kinetic and potential energy inside an electron (orbital) of an atom referred to as vibrational energy? Or just electrical?

And would each orbital be vibrating at a particular frequency -- an EM frequency?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, there is nothing vibrational about it. You cannot have a classical view of what goes on at the atomic level, it is described by quantum mechanics. There is a frequency associated to the orbitals, but it is a frequency related to the Schrödinger equation and not to a classical vibration.
 
Orodruin said:
No, there is nothing vibrational about it. You cannot have a classical view of what goes on at the atomic level, it is described by quantum mechanics. There is a frequency associated to the orbitals, but it is a frequency related to the Schrödinger equation and not to a classical vibration.

So the kinetic energy in each orbital of an atom is not vibrational energy, therefore doesn't contribute to the vibration of an orbital?

Then is there a quantum energy that is vibrational and within each orbital?

Does the orbital have a quantum vibration (like that of a standing wave)? Is that what you were alluding to when you were speaking of a frequency (of a non-classical type) associated to an orbital?

I've heard it said that an electron is described by a probabilistic quantum wavefunction, which spreads out through space and vibrates. Is this correct?

There would be a quantum vibrational frequency for each orbital within an atom?
 
Last edited:
desta41 said:
I've heard it said that an electron is described by a probabilistic quantum wavefunction, which spreads out through space and vibrates.
The first part is true, the last is not true in all cases. Observation of quantity in QM is usually characterized by the mean value of the operator associated to that quantity. If the atom is in one of its Hamiltonian's eigenstate, let's say ##|a\rangle## (which is called the stationary state), the mean value of any observables including position is time independent: ##\langle a | U^\dagger r U| a \rangle = e^{i(E_a-E_a)t/\hbar} \langle a | r | a \rangle = \langle a | r | a \rangle##, i.e. there is no change of the most probable position to find an electron in time possible. This mean value may depend on time if the atom is in a superposition state.

desta41 said:
There would be a quantum vibrational frequency for each orbital within an atom?
There does exist vibrational degree of freedom in molecules but not in atoms.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top