News Is the FBI's Expansion of Surveillance Powers Justified?

  • Thread starter Thread starter The Smoking Man
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Safety
AI Thread Summary
New federal wiretapping rules are facing legal challenges from telecommunications firms, nonprofit organizations, and educational institutions. These regulations, which expand an existing surveillance law, mandate that Internet service providers and universities modify their networks to facilitate FBI surveillance of email and web browsing. Proponents of the rules, including the FBI and Justice Department, argue that they are necessary to combat crime and terrorism, claiming that current laws do not adequately address the capabilities of criminals to hide their communications. Critics contend that the regulations infringe on civil liberties and primarily impact average users, as determined criminals can easily use encryption methods to evade surveillance. The discussion highlights concerns over law enforcement's expanding reach and the implications for privacy rights.
The Smoking Man
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
http://techrepublic.com.com/2100-1009-5911676.html"

New federal wiretapping rules forcing Internet service providers and universities to rewire their networks for FBI surveillance of e-mail and Web browsing are being challenged in court.

Telecommunications firms, nonprofit organizations and educators are asking the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C., to overturn the controversial rules, which dramatically extend the sweep of an 11-year-old surveillance law designed to guarantee police the ability to eavesdrop on telephone calls.

The regulations represent the culmination of years of lobbying by the FBI, the Justice Department and the Drug Enforcement Administration, which have argued that "criminals, terrorists and spies" could cloak their Internet communications with impunity unless police received broad new surveillance powers. The final rules, published this month by the Federal Communications Commission, apply to "any type of broadband Internet access service" and many Internet phone services.

The new http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2005/05-20606.htm".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry, but what the FBI wants is just stupid. Any determined criminal, terrorist, or spy could easily encrypt a message with a one-time pad. It's the average person who would suffer. Once again, we see an example of law enforcement trying to extend its reach over civilians.
 
Manchot said:
I'm sorry, but what the FBI wants is just stupid. Any determined criminal, terrorist, or spy could easily encrypt a message with a one-time pad. It's the average person who would suffer. Once again, we see an example of law enforcement trying to extend its reach over civilians.
Has http://www.pgp.com/" (Pretty Good Privacy) Ever supplied the FBI with a master key to crack their encryption?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
43
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Back
Top