Is the following result trivial?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JoanBraidy
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that there are infinitely many integers n such that S_n contains an element of order n^k for any natural number k. The proof utilizes induction and comparisons involving sums of powers of integers and products of primes, referencing Bertrand's postulate for support. The author suggests that while the result may seem trivial, the proof's complexity and reliance on established theorems complicate its classification. The conversation also touches on the subjective nature of labeling mathematical results as trivial. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the significance of the findings while acknowledging differing opinions on their triviality.
JoanBraidy
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I proved there's infinitely many n such that S_n has an element of order n^2
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Trivialish.

3^2+4^2+5^2<3.4.5.

Suppose 3^{2i}+4^{2i}+5^{2i}<3^i.4^i.5^i for i<n, then
3^{2(i+1)}+4^{2(i+1)}+5^{2(i+1)}<25(3^i.4^i.5^i)<3^{i+1}4^{i+1}5^{i+1}, hence 3^{2n}+4^{2n}+5^{2n}<3^n4^n5^n by induction.

It follows that S_{3^n4^n5^n} has an element of order (3^n4^n5^n)^2 for all n\in \mathbb{N}.

Similarly 5^{3n}+7^{3n}+9^{3n}+11^{3n}<5^n7^n9^n11^n, so there are an infinite number of k such that S_k contains an element of order k^3.

I think its probably true that there are an infinite number of n such that S_n contains an element of order n^k for any k\in \mathbb{N}.
 
Last edited:
Martin Rattigan said:
Trivialish.

3^2+4^2+5^2<3.4.5.

Suppose 3^{2i}+4^{2i}+5^{2i}<3^i.4^i.5^i for i<n, then
3^{2(i+1)}+4^{2(i+1)}+5^{2(i+1)}<25(3^i.4^i.5^i)<3^{i+1}4^{i+1}5^{i+1}, hence 3^{2n}+4^{2n}+5^{2n}<3^n4^n5^n by induction.

It follows that S_{3^n4^n5^n} has an element of order (3^n4^n5^n)^2 for all n\in \mathbb{N}.

Similarly 5^{3n}+7^{3n}+9^{3n}+11^{3n}<5^n7^n9^n11^n, so there are an infinite number of k such that S_k contains an element of order k^3.

I think its probably true that there are an infinite number of n such that S_n contains an element of order n^k for any k\in \mathbb{N}.

similar to what I did thanks

if I proved the general case, do you think that would be trivial?
 
There are straightforward proofs quoting Bertrand's postulate or the prime number theorem or other theorems on prime distribution. Most people wouldn't call the quoted theorems trivial, so you'd probably want to distinguish between a trivial result and a trivial proof.

I've appended a proof (I tried to put this under a spoiler but it doesn't seem to work with latexed code - you'll just have to avoid looking if you're still doing your own proof). Whether you'd call the proof trivial is really subjective.

For k=0 it is trivial that S_n has an element of order n^k.

For any k\in\mathbb{N},k\geq1

p_n^k+p_{n+1}^k+\dots+p_{n+r}^k+\dots+p_{n+k}^k
\leq p_n^k(1+2^k+2^{2k}+\dots+2^{rk}+\dots+2^{k^2})\text{ (By Bertrand's postulate)}
=p_n^k(2^{k(k+1)}-1)/(2^k-1)

If n_k is chosen so that
p_{n_k+k}\geq (2^{k(k+1)}-1)/(2^k-1)
then for any n\geq n_k

p_n^k(2^{k(k+1)}-1)/(2^k-1)
\leq p_n^k(p_{n+k})
\leq p_np_{n+1}\dots p_{n+r}\dots p_{n+k-1}p_{n+k}

Hence for any such n, S_{p_np_{n+1}\dots p_{n+r}\dots p_{n+k}} contains an element of order (p_np_{n+1}\dots p_{n+r}\dots p_{n+k})^k.
 
Last edited:
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top