Is the following result trivial?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter JoanBraidy
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of a mathematical result concerning the existence of elements of certain orders within specific sets, denoted as S_n. Participants explore whether the proofs and results presented are trivial or not, engaging in a debate about the implications of their findings and the definitions of triviality in mathematical proofs.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant claims to have proven that there are infinitely many n such that S_n has an element of order n^2.
  • Another participant presents a series of inequalities involving powers of integers and suggests that this leads to the conclusion that S_{3^n4^n5^n} has an element of order (3^n4^n5^n)^2 for all n in the natural numbers.
  • This participant also conjectures that it is probably true that there are infinitely many n such that S_n contains an element of order n^k for any k in the natural numbers.
  • A different participant mentions that there are straightforward proofs involving Bertrand's postulate or the prime number theorem, arguing that while theorems themselves may not be trivial, the distinction between a trivial result and a trivial proof is subjective.
  • This participant provides a detailed proof involving prime distributions and inequalities, asserting that for any k in the natural numbers, there exists an n such that S_{p_np_{n+1}\dots p_{n+r}\dots p_{n+k}} contains an element of order (p_np_{n+1}\dots p_{n+r}\dots p_{n+k})^k.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the results and proofs are trivial, with some suggesting that the proofs are straightforward while others question the triviality of the results themselves. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the classification of the results as trivial or not.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about the nature of mathematical proofs and the definitions of triviality, which are not fully explored or agreed upon by participants.

JoanBraidy
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I proved there's infinitely many n such that S_n has an element of order n^2
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Trivialish.

3^2+4^2+5^2<3.4.5.

Suppose 3^{2i}+4^{2i}+5^{2i}<3^i.4^i.5^i for i<n, then
3^{2(i+1)}+4^{2(i+1)}+5^{2(i+1)}<25(3^i.4^i.5^i)<3^{i+1}4^{i+1}5^{i+1}, hence 3^{2n}+4^{2n}+5^{2n}<3^n4^n5^n by induction.

It follows that S_{3^n4^n5^n} has an element of order (3^n4^n5^n)^2 for all n\in \mathbb{N}.

Similarly 5^{3n}+7^{3n}+9^{3n}+11^{3n}<5^n7^n9^n11^n, so there are an infinite number of k such that S_k contains an element of order k^3.

I think its probably true that there are an infinite number of n such that S_n contains an element of order n^k for any k\in \mathbb{N}.
 
Last edited:
Martin Rattigan said:
Trivialish.

3^2+4^2+5^2<3.4.5.

Suppose 3^{2i}+4^{2i}+5^{2i}<3^i.4^i.5^i for i<n, then
3^{2(i+1)}+4^{2(i+1)}+5^{2(i+1)}<25(3^i.4^i.5^i)<3^{i+1}4^{i+1}5^{i+1}, hence 3^{2n}+4^{2n}+5^{2n}<3^n4^n5^n by induction.

It follows that S_{3^n4^n5^n} has an element of order (3^n4^n5^n)^2 for all n\in \mathbb{N}.

Similarly 5^{3n}+7^{3n}+9^{3n}+11^{3n}<5^n7^n9^n11^n, so there are an infinite number of k such that S_k contains an element of order k^3.

I think its probably true that there are an infinite number of n such that S_n contains an element of order n^k for any k\in \mathbb{N}.

similar to what I did thanks

if I proved the general case, do you think that would be trivial?
 
There are straightforward proofs quoting Bertrand's postulate or the prime number theorem or other theorems on prime distribution. Most people wouldn't call the quoted theorems trivial, so you'd probably want to distinguish between a trivial result and a trivial proof.

I've appended a proof (I tried to put this under a spoiler but it doesn't seem to work with latexed code - you'll just have to avoid looking if you're still doing your own proof). Whether you'd call the proof trivial is really subjective.

For k=0 it is trivial that S_n has an element of order n^k.

For any k\in\mathbb{N},k\geq1

p_n^k+p_{n+1}^k+\dots+p_{n+r}^k+\dots+p_{n+k}^k
\leq p_n^k(1+2^k+2^{2k}+\dots+2^{rk}+\dots+2^{k^2})\text{ (By Bertrand's postulate)}
=p_n^k(2^{k(k+1)}-1)/(2^k-1)

If n_k is chosen so that
p_{n_k+k}\geq (2^{k(k+1)}-1)/(2^k-1)
then for any n\geq n_k

p_n^k(2^{k(k+1)}-1)/(2^k-1)
\leq p_n^k(p_{n+k})
\leq p_np_{n+1}\dots p_{n+r}\dots p_{n+k-1}p_{n+k}

Hence for any such n, S_{p_np_{n+1}\dots p_{n+r}\dots p_{n+k}} contains an element of order (p_np_{n+1}\dots p_{n+r}\dots p_{n+k})^k.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K