Is the Function f(x) = x/(1-x^2) Surjective on Its Domain?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Poopsilon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function f:(-1,1)→R defined by f(x)=x/(1-x^2) is surjective. This conclusion is reached by analyzing the behavior of the function as it approaches the boundaries of its domain, where it diverges to -∞ and ∞. Although the explicit solution for x in terms of y is complex, the continuity of the function and its limits demonstrate that every real number y has a corresponding x in the interval (-1,1) such that f(x)=y. The quadratic formula reveals that the solutions for y≠0 do not yield valid x values within the specified domain, reinforcing the surjectivity of the function.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of surjective functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with polynomial functions and their limits
  • Knowledge of the quadratic formula and its applications
  • Basic concepts of continuity in mathematical functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of surjective functions in more depth
  • Learn about the continuity of rational functions and their implications
  • Explore the behavior of functions at their domain boundaries
  • Investigate the application of the quadratic formula in different contexts
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in advanced function analysis and properties of surjective mappings.

Poopsilon
Messages
288
Reaction score
1
The problem is:

Prove that the function, f:(-1,1)->R given by f(x)=x/(1-x^2) is surjective

The way I have learned to prove a function is surjective is to solve for an x that is given explicitly in terms of y and then plug it into the equation and show that y=y, and thus any y in the codomain will have a corresponding x such that f(x)=y. But in this problem I can't for the life of me seem to solve for an x explicitly in terms of y, I'm assuming it can't be done. I solved for an x explicitly in terms of x and y, but I'm not sure what that gets me. There must a more intuitive, simple way to prove it.

I mean I understand why its surjective since at -1 and 1 the function diverges to -∞ and ∞ respectively so every value in R will have some corresponding input within the open interval (-1,1), but I can't figure out how to prove it without employing facts about the continuity of polynomials and limits etc. which I don't believe I am allowed to use.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's try once again:
[tex]y=\frac{x}{1-x^2}[/tex]
[tex]y - x^2y=x[/tex]
[tex]y x^2 + x - y = 0[/tex]
Now, recall the quadratic formula:
[tex]x=\frac{1}{2y}(1\pm \sqrt{1+4y^2})[/tex]
for [tex]y\neq 0[/tex]. But solution with "+" is clearly greater than one or less than -1.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K