MHB Is the Function Phi Lipschitz for Lebesgue Measurable Sets?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lipschitz
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

Let $E \subset \mathbb{R}^d$ Lebesgue measurable and $\phi (t)=m \left ( \Pi_{i=1}^{d} (-\infty , t_i ) \cap E \right )$. To show that $\phi$ is Lipschitz, can we do it as followed??

Let $x>y$.

$$|\phi(x) - \phi(y)|=|m \left ( \Pi_{i=1}^{d} (-\infty , x_i ) \cap E \right )-m \left ( \Pi_{i=1}^{d} (-\infty , y_i ) \cap E \right )|=|m \left [ \left ( \Pi_{i=1}^{d} (-\infty , x_i ) \cap E \right ) \setminus \left ( (-\infty , y_i ) \cap E \right ) \right ]| \leq m \left ( \Pi_{i=1}^{d} [y_{i}, x_{i} ] \right )=\Pi_{i=1}^{d} [y_{i}, x_{i}]$$

Is it correct?? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, that is correct. You can also see that $\phi$ is Lipschitz by noting that the difference $|\phi(x) - \phi(y)| \leq |x-y|$, which follows from the fact that $E$ is measurable and that $m(\cdot)$ is a measure.
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K