Is the Gradient Vector Only Applicable for Multivariable Functions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Telemachus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gradient Variable
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of the gradient vector in vector calculus, particularly in relation to single-variable and multivariable functions. The original poster questions whether the gradient is applicable only to functions of multiple variables and explores the geometric interpretation of the gradient as a vector normal to curves.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the gradient in the context of a single-variable function, specifically a parabola, and questions how the gradient can be defined in one dimension. They consider the implications of the implicit function theorem and the idea of extending the function to two variables.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the relationship between the gradient and the derivative in single-variable functions. Some have noted that the first derivative represents the slope of the tangent, while others suggest that the gradient can be interpreted as a vector with the same magnitude as the derivative. There is an ongoing examination of the conditions under which the gradient can be defined.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the geometric interpretation of the gradient and its applicability to different dimensions, with participants questioning the assumptions about the normal vector in one-dimensional contexts.

Telemachus
Messages
820
Reaction score
30
Hi there. I have a doubt that I never cleared before, so I wanted your opinions on this. The thing is that when in vector calculus the gradient vector is presented, one of the "geometric" interpretation that is given is that it's a vector always perpendicular to the curve. So at first I've always tried to think in simpler cases when I have to face something new. I've tried going down one dimension. I always tried to think of this with a parabola of equation
[tex]y=x^2[/tex]
The thing is that if we think of the gradient for this parabola what we get its only the derivative, which is the slope of the curve. Of course, I would need another variable for y to get a vector pointing on the normal direction to the curve. So, how does this must be reasoned? how one gets the gradient vector for one variable functions? I thought that maybe involving the implicit function theorem I could get on something, but didn't get too far. The other idea requires to "extend" the function on two variables, thinking of it as the intersection of a surface with a plane.

Is it that the gradient only exists for functions of more of one variable? now that I wrote all this I'm thinking that the interpretation of the gradient as a vector normal to the curve (or the surface) perhaps only holds for two dimensional curves, because if we go one dimesion over then we can't think in something like the normal vector, right? and with one dimension less we only get the slope for the curve.

So what you say?

Bye there, thanks for posting.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The first derivative of a function of a single variable gives an expression for the slope of the tangent to the curve of that function. From the text of your question, it appears that you are looking to find a normal to the curve instead of a tangent.

If y = f(x), then dy/dx| x = x0 gives the slope m of the tangent at x = x0

To find the slope n of the normal, n = -1/m = -1/dy/dx = -dx/dy provided that dy/dx is not equal to zero at x = x0.
 
The gradient of a single-variable function would indeed be the derivative (or rather, a vector with the same magnitude as the derivative).
 
Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K