Is the Hamiltonian Cycle an NP Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter neurocomp2003
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hamiltonian
neurocomp2003
Messages
1,359
Reaction score
4
sup, just realized there is not graphtheory/combinatorial subforums.

is the hamiltonian cycle still considered and NP problem?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The problem of finding a Hamiltonian cycle in a graph is NP-complete (and therefore NP). This is a proven fact; it is not something that is under consideration (and so it will not change in the future).
 
I wonder what thought could have raised this question :)

-- AI
 
having an algorithm that i want to code but I'm lazy. and if the question of NP=P was solved then there was no point =] guess that should have been my question but I just wanted to see if there was apaper out their that said H=P.
 
As master_coda has stated, Hamiltonian is "proved" to be NP-complete.
Now, if i understand your last post, then you seem to have an algorithm for Hamiltonian in which case you have solved the NP=P problem! When are we going to see your paper coming out :D

-- AI
 
hahah i have an algorithm that I would like to try and see if it goes anywhere...not going to say it'll solve NP=P, but i want to see if it can go somewhere.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top