Is the Light Cone a Valid Representation of Light's Behavior?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the validity of the light cone as a representation of light's behavior in space-time diagrams. It highlights that while light rays spread isotropically, the mathematical representation using a right triangle may lead to confusion regarding the relationship between time, speed, and space. Participants clarify that the hypotenuse described does not represent the actual path of light or any particle, as it exceeds the speed of light, which is not physically possible. The space-time interval remains zero for events connected by light speed, emphasizing that light follows a null trajectory rather than a traditional world line. Overall, the conversation challenges the interpretation of the light cone in relation to light's actual behavior in physics.
zarmewa
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
As smatter in the subject therefore I have the following confused questions about the light-cone.

As we all know that when a flash of light is released from source, light-rays spread out isotropically in space, tracing out a cone on a space-time diagram. As "light-cone" is expanded at the speed of light, and light emitted at the apex and moves on the surface of the cone, therefore, at any instant “t” say one light second, the radius, edge and the vertical axis of cone represent a right angle triangle in which

Vertical axis is the perpendicular of triangle; x = time

Radius of cone is the base of triangle; y = speed of light in one second

Edge of the cone is the hypotenuse of triangle; z = space-time diagram of a pulse in one second

Thus x2 + y2 = z2, where z > c, so is this possible?

The space-time interval is always zero between two events connected by a light speed path BUT the slant edge of cone which is GREATER than the speed of light "c" represents the true motion of a pulse [world line] in both space and time, therefore, isn’t time dilating even in a stationary light clock due to extra distance covered by a pulse in its world-line?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I don't think the Light Cone in a spacetime diagram is the same as a light cone from an object emitting light.
 
zarmewa said:
Vertical axis is the perpendicular of triangle; x = time

Radius of cone is the base of triangle; y = speed of light in one second

Edge of the cone is the hypotenuse of triangle; z = space-time diagram of a pulse in one second

Thus x2 + y2 = z2, where z > c, so is this possible?
The hypotenuse you're describing doesn't represent the path of any particle or signal---its just some line that you're drawing. The length of that line is 'z', which is not a velocity (like the speed of light 'c').

zarmewa said:
The space-time interval is always zero between two events connected by a light speed path BUT the slant edge of cone which is GREATER than the speed of light "c" represents the true motion of a pulse [world line] in both space and time
The spacetime interval (ds) is zero along a null-like trajectory (i.e. light path); a 'pulse' would follow the same time of (45deg) null-trajectory----not a world-line (horizontal or vertical depending on how you're drawing your diagram).
 
I recently purchased a lunar clock intended as a Christmas present for a young family friend who has become interested in astronomy. The clock face shows twelve images of the Moon in all its main phases, with the Full Moon depicted at the "twelve o'clock" position. Now I purchased this clock especially early to allow time to check on its accuracy. After waiting for a full lunar orbit to occur, I have since discovered that the clock time when measured relative to its lunar images (that's to...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K