Is the Lorentz force conservative?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Lorentz force, which acts on a wire carrying current I in a magnetic field B, is not a conservative force. This conclusion arises from the fact that the Lorentz force depends on the velocity of charged particles, meaning that the work done is path-dependent. The discussion highlights that while the electric field can be conservative under static conditions, the magnetic field's properties, as defined by Maxwell's equations, indicate it is inherently non-conservative. Therefore, the Lorentz force cannot be classified as conservative since it does not meet the necessary criteria of being independent of the path taken.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Lorentz force equation: F = q(E + v x B)
  • Familiarity with Maxwell's equations and their implications for electric and magnetic fields
  • Knowledge of conservative forces and their definitions in classical mechanics
  • Basic understanding of vector calculus, particularly curl and divergence
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Maxwell's equations on electromagnetic fields
  • Learn about conservative and non-conservative forces in classical mechanics
  • Explore the relationship between electric fields and potential energy
  • Investigate the role of velocity in the dynamics of charged particles in magnetic fields
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students studying electromagnetism who seek to understand the nature of forces acting on charged particles and the implications of these forces in various physical scenarios.

  • #31
This is a bit subtle, and I think there are already many answers to your question. So here are my 2cts in addition.

Usually in classical mechanics an external force is called "conservative", if it only depends on the position of the particle and if it has a scalar potential, i.e., if it is of the form
\vec{F}(\vec{x})=-\vec{\nabla} U(\vec{x}).

An interaction force between two particles is called conservative, if there exists a potential U(\vec{x}_1-\vec{x}_2) such that
\vec{F}_{12}=-\vec{\nabla}_1 U=-\vec{\nabla}_2 U=-F_{21}.
The specific dependence on the difference of the position vectors of the two particles is demanded by Newton's 3rd Law ("actio=reactio").

Other posters have already stated the conditions on the force/interaction field(s) that guarantee the existence of a potential and thus the criteria for a force/interaction being conservative.

Examples are the motion of a charged particle in an electrostatic field or the mutual gravitative attraction between bodies (in Newtonian approximation).

This is a pretty limited view on forces, however. E.g., there are nearly no relativistically covariant forces. An exception is the motion in an electrostatic field. Here, the equation of motion is governed by the more general Lorentz force, including the interaction with the magnetic field, but this force is not conservative in the above given sense, because the force depends on the velocity of the particle and not only on its position.

Nevertheless the conservation of energy holds for static (and only static!) electromagnetic fields, as can be easily proven by taking the line integral of the force along the particle's trajectory under the influence of the Lorentz force. It turns out that only the electric field does work on the particle while the magnetic field only changes the direction of the particle's trajectory. Indeed the power is
P=\vec{v} \cdot \vec{F}=\vec{v} \cdot q \left (\vec{E}+\frac{\vec{v}}{c} \times \vec{B} \right )=q \vec{v} \cdot \vec{E}.
The total energy of the particle is given by
\mathcal{E}=\frac{m c^2}{\sqrt{1-\vec{v}^2/c^2}}+q \Phi,
where \Phi is the potential of the electrostatic field,
\vec{E}=-\vec{\nabla} \Phi.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
684
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K