Is the magnetic field a mathematical abstraction?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the magnetic field is merely a mathematical abstraction or has physical reality. It asserts that while the magnetic field can be described mathematically, it is as real as the particles it surrounds, influencing their behavior and interactions. The conversation highlights that electromagnetic fields occupy space, contain energy, and create conditions that affect charged particles. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of understanding the field's role in momentum conservation and the propagation of forces at the speed of light. Ultimately, the magnetic field is recognized as a complex phenomenon that combines both mathematical and physical elements.
rainstom07
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Is the magnetic field purely a mathematical abstraction or is there actually something there? In other words, if a proton floating in deep space, is there actually something that shoots out in all directions from the proton that will interact with another charge particle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is a question of philosophy.
You can measure the magnetic field, so I would say it is there. The proton does not "shoot" with anything, it just has a magnetic field around it, which is as real as the proton itself.
 
If two protons are floating in space, they'll feel an electrical field between each other and repel, but if you see them zip by you in space at relativistic speeds, they'll behave differently from your point of view by repelling slower than they should, and you'll see a new force.

But it doesn't matter -- the math was invented to describe the behavior, so ultimately it's all mathematical abstraction and you use whatever level of complexity is necessary to solve your problem.
 
I look at it this way. If the EM field isn't real, then how can an EM wave exist? It may not be physical like a baseball, but I'd say it's as real as anything else.

From wiki:

Defining the field as "numbers in space" shouldn't detract from the idea that it has physical reality. “It occupies space. It contains energy. Its presence eliminates a true vacuum.”[2] The field creates a "condition in space"[3] such that when we put a particle in it, the particle "feels" a force.

If an electrical charge is moved, the effects on another charge do not appear instantaneously. The first charge feels a reaction force, picking up momentum, but the second charge feels nothing until the influence, traveling at the speed of light, reaches it and gives it the momentum. Where is the momentum before the second charge moves? By the law of conservation of momentum it must be somewhere. Physicists have found it of "great utility for the analysis of forces"[3] to think of it as being in the field.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_(physics)
 
If you consider the relativistic effect of the motion of electrons at snail's pace, in a wire, the resulting forces of attraction and repulsion can be calculated accurately by just looking at the resulting electric forces between two wires. Or you can work it out differently (using the Lorenz - magnetic - force idea).
You can call it magnetism or not, as you please.
 
rainstom07 said:
Is the magnetic field purely a mathematical abstraction or is there actually something there? In other words, if a proton floating in deep space, is there actually something that shoots out in all directions from the proton that will interact with another charge particle?
Can a mathematical abstraction do all of the things that a magnetic field does?
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top