Is the Pre-Image Always Open in Topological Spaces?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jooolz
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of pre-images under a continuous function defined on the product of two topological spaces. Participants explore whether the pre-image of certain open sets in the real numbers, specifically intervals, is open in the context of the function defined as the supremum over a second variable.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the pre-image g-1(A) is open for A = (r, ∞) but not necessarily for A = (-∞, t), expressing uncertainty about the conditions on X.
  • Another participant suggests applying definitions related to continuity and supremum to demonstrate the openness of g-1(A) for certain intervals.
  • A participant seeks clarification on the continuity argument presented, specifically regarding the existence of an open set around (x,y) such that f(x,y) exceeds a certain threshold.
  • There is a mention of constructing a counterexample using the function f(x,y) = arctan(x²y²) to illustrate the non-openness of g-1(A) for some cases.
  • A later reply raises the question of whether g-1((-∞, b)) would be open if Y is a compact space, indicating a potential condition that could affect the openness of the pre-image.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the conditions under which g-1(A) is open, particularly regarding the implications of the topology of X and the properties of the function f. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives on the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the dependence on the definitions of continuity and the specific properties of the spaces involved, as well as the potential impact of compactness on the openness of pre-images.

Jooolz
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I am struggling with the following:

If X and Y are topological spaces. and f: X x Y → ℝ is a continuous function (product topology on X x Y, Euclidean topology on ℝ)

Let g: X → ℝ defined by g(x) = sup { f(x,y) | y in Y }

Then: If A=(r, ∞) for r in ℝ, g-1(A) is open. And If A=(-∞, t) for t in ℝ, g-1(A) is not always open.

Why is that? How can I know if g-1(A) is open or not if I don't know anything about X??

Does anyone have an idea?

kind regards,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is one of those "apply the definitions" problems. Let x \in g^{-1}(t,\infty). By definition, there exists \epsilon >0 such that g(x)>t+2\epsilon. By definition of supremum, there exists y \in Y such that f(x,y)>t+\epsilon. By definition of continuity, there exists an open set A containing (x,y) such that f(x,y)>t+\epsilon/2 for all (x,y) \in A. By definition of the product topology, there exists an open set B in X containing x such that \forall z \in B, \exists y_z \in Y, (z,y_z) \in A. Hence g(z) > t for all z in B.

For the reverse, just construct a counterexample. Take the plane and consider the function f(x,y)=arctan(x^2 y^2)
 
Hi zhentil,

Thank you very much for helping!

Sorry, I don't see immediately why this holds:

"By definition of continuity, there exists an open set A containing (x,y) such that
f(x,y)>t+ϵ/2 for all (x,y)∈A"

For this we need that some subset of { f(x,y) } is open?
 
or is it the set were t + ε/2 < f(x,y) < t + ε ?
 
(t+\epsilon/2,\infty) is an open set in R. Hence its pre-image is open by definition of continuity. (x,y) lies in that set.
 
thank you.

"For the reverse, just construct a counterexample. Take the plane and consider the function
f(x,y)=arctan(x2y2)"

Would g-1((-∞, b)) be open if Y is a compact space?
 
Jooolz said:
Hi all,

I am struggling with the following:

If X and Y are topological spaces. and f: X x Y → ℝ is a continuous function (product topology on X x Y, Euclidean topology on ℝ)

Let g: X → ℝ defined by g(x) = sup { f(x,y) | y in Y }

Then: If A=(r, ∞) for r in ℝ, g-1(A) is open. And If A=(-∞, t) for t in ℝ, g-1(A) is not always open.

Why is that? How can I know if g-1(A) is open or not if I don't know anything about X??

Does anyone have an idea?

kind regards,


Well, let's see. Let me review for next time I teach point set topology, so you can
combine it with Zhentil's answer:

What is g-1(a,b)? it is the collection of all x such that there is a y in Y
with a<f(x,y)<b.

We have g=Sof(x,y) , where f:XxY→f(XxY), and S:f(XxY)→ℝ , and g-1:=

f-1os-1.

Like Zhentil said, if there is y0 with f(x,y0)>a , then , by

(assumed) continuity of f, there is a ball B(x,y0) where f(x,y)>a . This

gives you openness in the subspace f(XxY). Now, compose with f-1, to

get an open set in XxY, by assumed continuity of f(x,y).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K