Is the Riemann Hypothesis the Key to Predicting Prime Numbers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jarfi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Prime
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Riemann Hypothesis, which posits that all non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function lie on the critical line in the complex plane, specifically with a real part of 1/2. This hypothesis, proposed over 150 years ago by mathematician Bernhard Riemann, is crucial for understanding the distribution of prime numbers. While it suggests a method for predicting prime numbers, it remains unproven, and solving it could have significant implications, including potential vulnerabilities in computer security systems. The equation referenced in the discussion relates to the zeta function, which is integral to number theory. The Riemann Hypothesis continues to be one of the most important unsolved problems in mathematics.
Jarfi
Messages
384
Reaction score
12
What was the unsolved prime number equation?

Ok so at math today my teacher told us just for fun about a math equation(wasnt really paying attention) this equation is an equation that tells where on a linaer graph prime numbers are zero, it was able to predict a prime number or something on a linaer graph. I think it was this guy http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RiemannZetaFunction.html but those equations don't look like in my math class.
+∞
The equation goes something like this: (t)z=∑(and something more here it think)
z

He said that this equation could predict all prime numbers and if someone would be able to solve it witch has not been done yet, he could hack all kinds of computer algorithms and break into bank systems just by finding the solution to this equation??

oh and i do remember ∞ being above ∑

The guy who made this equation was rienn... something I just can't remember what his name or the equations name was.

Could you tell me what equation this is?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The 9th equation on the site you linked is likely the one you saw in class
 
Yes, that is what your teacher was referring to. However, there is no "solution to the equation." The man who developed a lot of it, riemann, basically suggested that besides the negative even integers (-2, -4, -6, etc.) that all numbers that make his zeta-function ,\zeta(s), equal 0 are complex numbers with real part 1/2. The big issue is that he suggested this over 150 years ago, with no real proof, and no one has since been able to fully prove it. The function also tells helps explain things about prime numbers, and other fun things. This is known as the "Riemann Hypothesis."
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top