I Is the Series 2,3,5,8,13,21 a Fibonacci Sequence?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ling Min Hao
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    sequence series
Ling Min Hao
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Is the series of numbers 2,3,5,8,13,21 ... a fibronacci sequence ? Because it doesn't start with 1 , but it fulfills the explicit formula .
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Ling Min Hao said:
Is the series of numbers 2,3,5,8,13,21 ... a fibronacci sequence ? Because it doesn't start with 1 , but it fulfills the explicit formula .
How do you define a Fibonacci sequence?
 
PeroK said:
How do you define a Fibonacci sequence?
I don't know , but from wikipedia , it says Fibronacci starts from either 0,1 or 1,1 but is 2,3,5,8,13,21... a Fibronacci sequence it remains unknown for me ..
 
Ling Min Hao said:
I don't know , but from wikipedia , it says Fibonacci starts from either 0,1 or 1,1 but is 2,3,5,8,13,21... a Fibronacci sequence it remains unknown for me ..
I guess it depends on author and purpose whether only the classical sequence is meant or all possible. I looked up "generalized Fibonacci sequence" and found, e.g. http://www.maths.surrey.ac.uk/hosted-sites/R.Knott/Fibonacci/fibGen.html

As so often the key lies in the question: What's your goal? Usually "a Fibonacci sequence" simply has to obey ##F_{n+1} = F_n + F_{n-1}##. Initial values result in different sequences. If someone speaks about "the Fibonacci sequence ##F_n##" he probably means the one starting with ##(0,1)##. Generalized ones should clearly by stated as such, which often can be recognized the way they define the initial values: ##(F_0,F_1)=(a_0,a_1)## indicates the usage of generalized ones. Formulas which contain ##F_n## without any further explanation probably refer to the classic sequence only.
 
Ling Min Hao said:
I don't know , but from wikipedia , it says Fibronacci starts from either 0,1 or 1,1 but is 2,3,5,8,13,21... a Fibronacci sequence it remains unknown for me ..
A question like this is entirely definition dependent. If you allow a Fibonacci sequence to have any two initial terms, then it is. If not, then it's not. Or, in this case, it is simply not the full sequence.
 
  • Like
Likes mfb
If you apply prime numbers than it can be consider as a Fibonacci series. If you have any doubts to calculate Fibonacci series than you can visit Ashbox to use calculation tools.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top