Is the speed of light really changing over time?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kuahji
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Speed
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the claims made by a biology professor regarding the speed of light, including the assertion that it is no longer considered a constant and that it may change over time. Participants explore the implications of these claims, referencing both the stopping of light using magnetic fields and the potential variation of light speed in different contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the biology professor's assertion that the speed of light is no longer considered a constant, emphasizing that the speed of light in a vacuum remains constant.
  • Others note that any variation in the speed of light typically refers to its transmission through different media, such as water, rather than in a vacuum.
  • A participant expresses skepticism about the claim that scientists have stopped a beam of light using magnetic fields, requesting peer-reviewed sources to substantiate this assertion.
  • There are references to theories suggesting a variable speed of light, but participants agree that these are speculative and not widely accepted in the scientific community.
  • Concerns are raised about the biology professor's interpretation of the speed of light changing over time, particularly in relation to the sun's energy depletion, with participants seeking clarification on the basis of such claims.
  • Some participants express frustration over the biology professor's use of scientific claims outside his field of expertise, suggesting he should refrain from making definitive statements on physics topics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the speed of light in a vacuum is constant, but there is disagreement regarding the biology professor's claims about its variability and the stopping of light. The discussion remains unresolved on the validity of the professor's statements and the existence of peer-reviewed evidence supporting them.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the speculative nature of theories regarding a variable speed of light and the importance of distinguishing between established facts and hypotheses. There is also mention of the need for peer-reviewed sources to support extraordinary claims.

kuahji
Messages
390
Reaction score
2
My biology professor keeps talking about how the speed of light is no longer considered a constant. Anyway, he went on to quote how scientists have stopped a beam of light using magnetic fields. I've read a few popular science articles in the magazine New Scientists but found nothing that would indicate a violation of relativity or even one using magnetic fields. He also stated that the speed of light is changing over time. He used an example regarding how the sun will eventually run out of energy & between that time the speed of light will slow down as a result.

So...
Can anyone point me in the right direction of information on the stopping light with magnetic fields? (if there really were/are any)

Does anyone know of any articles regarding the slowing of the speed of light?

Overall, I understand a biology professor is not a physics professor but he keeps using various examples as if they were facts. Often stating "we once though the speed of light was a constant."
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When we refer to the speed of light being a constant, we're usually referring to the speed of light in a vacuum. Any slowing of the speed of light involves its transmission through a medium of some sort. For example, the speed of light in water is about 3/4 the speed of light in vacuum. This is the basis of refraction in lenses etc.

I understand there are theories which incorporate or predict a variable speed of light (in vacuum), but as far as I know they are speculative, and not widely accepted.
 
Last edited:
kuahji said:
My biology professor keeps talking about how the speed of light is no longer considered a constant. Anyway, he went on to quote how scientists have stopped a beam of light using magnetic fields.

i'd like to see the peer-reviewed article for that one. I highly doubt its as he represented it.

I've read a few popular science articles in the magazine New Scientists but found nothing that would indicate a violation of relativity or even one using magnetic fields. He also stated that the speed of light is changing over time. He used an example regarding how the sun will eventually run out of energy & between that time the speed of light will slow down as a result.

He said what? Slow down as a result of what? The sun running out of hydrogen fuel?



So...
Can anyone point me in the right direction of information on the stopping light with magnetic fields? (if there really were/are any)

Does anyone know of any articles regarding the slowing of the speed of light?

Overall, I understand a biology professor is not a physics professor but he keeps using various examples as if they were facts. Often stating "we once though the speed of light was a constant."


I'm pretty sure he's mistating and misquoting whatever he's read (probably not intentionally).

What jtbell said pretty much covers it.
 
"a biology professor is not a physics professor."
 
This is a nice paper on "slowing light down": http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=PRLTAO000095000025253601000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=yes
 
Last edited by a moderator:
kuahji said:
Overall, I understand a biology professor is not a physics professor but he keeps using various examples as if they were facts. Often stating "we once though the speed of light was a constant."

The speed of light in vacuum is constant!
Your biology professor should stick to his field of knowledge.
 
EL said:
The speed of light in vacuum is constant!
Your biology professor should stick to his field of knowledge.


The professor is perhaps referring to hypotheses that c may have varied over the course of the universe. He should not be treating these mere hypotheses ("theories in search of confirmation") as facts or draw social conclusions from them.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
6K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 74 ·
3
Replies
74
Views
6K
Replies
60
Views
5K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K