Is the Sum of Square Roots of 2 and 3 Irrational? A Proof by Contradiction

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Irrational Root
MathematicalPhysics
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Yeh just having a problem seeing a way to prove that 6^(1/2) is irrational.

Using this answer and proof by contradiction I need to prove that
2^(1/2) + 3^(1/2)is also irrational, however I sould be able to attempt this if I can get the above right.

Any help much appreciated.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Here's a better proof than contradiction.

let z be the sqrt of any integer, if it is rational write it as a/b, do the usual squaring thing so that

z.b^2= a^2

look at the prime decompostions on both sides. Every prime mus occur with multiplicity two on the rhs, so it does on the lhs, which tells us in the prime decomposition of z every prime occurs twice, that is z is a perfect square. 6 is not a perfect square.
 
Thanks for that, the rest worked out a treat!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Back
Top