Is the symbol dx equivalent to Δx in these situations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter karkas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Symbol
AI Thread Summary
The symbols Δx and dx represent different concepts in mathematics and physics. Δx denotes a finite change in position (xfinal - xinitial), while dx signifies an infinitesimal change. In the context of speed, both v = Δx/Δt and v = dx/dt can be correct under specific conditions, such as when acceleration is absent. However, dx/dt is preferred for its precision, while Δx/Δt requires clarification of the interval used. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurately interpreting equations in differential calculus and physics.
karkas
Messages
131
Reaction score
1
I have seen the symbol dx in differential equations, but recently I saw it appear in various other equations that I previously thought included Δx instead of dx.

Are those two symbols the same? I mean, is Δx = dx = xfinal - xinitial ?

This may be the wrong thread, but I am still a newcomer, and plus I thought I saw another such question around here before!

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

karkas said:
I have seen the symbol dx in differential equations, but recently I saw it appear in various other equations that I previously thought included Δx instead of dx.

Are those two symbols the same? I mean, is Δx = dx = xfinal - xinitial ?

Hi karkas! Welcome to PF! :smile:

∆x is an actual difference.

dx is an infinitesimal difference.

dx/dt = lim{∆x(t)/∆t} = lim{[x(t+∆t) - x(t)]/∆t}.

(for linear functions, of course, it makes no difference)

So Δx = xfinal - xinitial is correct :smile:

but dx = xfinal - xinitial is wrong :cry:
 
Thanks Tiny - tim!

Yet I still don't understand something (probably it's because we're taught everything in Greek and I am still not adept with English terminology).

If I say that the speed is v = Δx/Δt and v = dx/dt is the same thing if there is no force disrupting the linear movement?
 
karkas said:
Thanks Tiny - tim!

Yet I still don't understand something (probably it's because we're taught everything in Greek and I am still not adept with English terminology).

If I say that the speed is v = Δx/Δt and v = dx/dt is the same thing if there is no force disrupting the linear movement?

hmm … mathematical symbols should be an international language! :smile:

Yes, v = dx/dt is always correct …

but if there's no acceleration, then v = ∆x/∆t is also correct.

However, when you write dx/dt, you don't need to explain it,

but when you write ∆x/∆t, you need to specify a particular interval. :wink:
 
In physics and engineering, cap delta is frequently used to denote a finite change, a little bit of something. Thus cap delta x denotes a finite change in x.

It is common in setting up a problem to write things in terms of finite differences before passing to the limit when these differences, in the form of ratios, become derivatives.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top