Is the textbook's answer correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GregA
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the integration of the function (x+1)/x(2x+1) using partial fractions. The user correctly identifies the partial fraction decomposition as 1/x - 1/(2x+1) and integrates it to obtain lnA + lnx + 1/2ln(2x+1). However, the textbook's answer simplifies this to ln(x/(2x+1)), omitting the constant of integration. The consensus is that the textbook's answer is incorrect, as it fails to account for the constant that should be included in the final result.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integration techniques, specifically integration by partial fractions.
  • Familiarity with logarithmic properties and constants of integration.
  • Knowledge of the cover-up method for finding coefficients in partial fractions.
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills to simplify expressions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review integration techniques, focusing on partial fraction decomposition.
  • Study the properties of logarithms and their applications in integration.
  • Learn more about the cover-up method for determining coefficients in partial fractions.
  • Explore common mistakes in integration and how to avoid them in calculus.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, particularly those focusing on integration techniques and partial fractions, as well as anyone seeking to clarify common misconceptions in textbook answers.

GregA
Messages
210
Reaction score
0
A pretty simple question that is doing my head in is the folllowing:
Integrate (x+1)/x(2x+1) w.r.t.x
by choosing to use partial fractions of the form A/x + B/2x+1 my working is as follows:
using the cover up method and x = 0 to find A I get A =1 ...(0+1)/(2(0)+1)
using x = -1/2 to find B I get B = -1...((-1/2+1)/-1/2)
this leaves me with 1/x - 1/(2x+1) to be integrated.
my answer being lnA + lnx +1/2ln(2x+1) or lnA(x/((2x+1)^(1/2)) (because 1 is half the derivative of 2x)...the books answer is simply ln(x/2x+1)...they omit the constant by specifying that all answers should include it...My question is: is there something wrong with my working or is the book's answer wrong and I should move on?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have the partial fraction decomposition right, and you've integrated correctly (except for a typo). It looks like the book answer is wrong.
 
grrrr nasty textbook! Cheers PhysicsMonkey :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K